Decadal study of Avifaunal Diversity of Banni Grass land, Katchchh, Gujarat, India
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Banni Grass land was one of the largest grasslands of arid systems in India. The region shows extreme climatic conditions with summer temperature hovering around 45° C to 50° C temperature and winter temperature dropping to 2 to 3 ° C and annual rainfall is only 2-3 cm. This type of climatic regime supports specific grasses and other vegetation that in turn sustains avifauna. Over the years, the area has undergone changes in vegetation characteristics and human pressures which has an impact on regional climate affecting the bird diversity. Since, birds are the important indicators of health of ecosystem the present study was undertaken to bring out the decadal changes in the faunal diversity. Study was undertaken in seven villages located within the Banni grasslands and the results show change in avifaunal composition as well as diversity between 2004 and 2014. The paper discusses how the vegetation change coupled with human interference have affected the bird composition and is important finding for long term conservation strategy of this unique grasslands. Keywords: Birds, Grassland, plants, Desert ecosystem. REFERENCES Butcher, G.S. 2007. Common birds in decline, a state of the birds report. Audubon 109, 58–62. Butler R. W. and Taylor W. 2005. A Review of Climate Change Impacts on Birds. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. pp. 1107-1109. Donald, P.F., Pisano, G., Rayment, M.D. & Pain, D.J. 2002. The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birds. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: pp- 167–182. GEC (Gujarat Ecology Commission) 1998. Ecorestoration of Banni Grassland. First Annual Technical Report, Gujarat Ecology Commission, Vadodara. Pp- 59. Henderson, I.G., Fuller, R.J., Conway, G.J. & Gough, S.J. 2004. Evidence for declines in populations of grassland-associated birds in marginal upland areas of Britain. Bird Study 51: pp- 12–19. Hoshino 2010. Soil organic carbon, temperature and water as affected by landuse and climate change. Global Environmental Research. 14: pp-23-28. Koladiya M. H., Gajera N. B., Mahato A. K. Roy, Kumar V. V. and Asari R. V. 2016. Birds of Banni Grassland. Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology (GUIDE). Published by Ravi Sankaran Foundation. Koladiya M. H., Gajera N. B., Roy Mahato A. K., Vijay Kumar V., Asari R.V., 2016. Birds of Banni Grassland. Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology (GUIDE). Published by The Ravi Sankaran Foundation. Krebs, C. J. 1985. Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Third edition, Harper and Row Publishers, New York. Lima, S. L. 1990. Protective cover and the use of space: different strategies in finches. Oikos, 58: pp-151–158. Miller-Rushing, A. J., Primack, R. B., & Sekercioglu, C. H. 2010. Conservation consequences of climate change for birds. Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp-295-310. Monroe A. P. and O’Connell T. J. 2014. Winter Bird Habitat Use in a Heterogeneous Tall grass Prairie the American Midland Naturalist 171(1) (2014) 171: pp-97–115. North American Bird Conservation Initiative, U.S. Committee, 2010. The State of the Birds 2010 Report on Climate Change, United States of America. U.S. Department of the Interior: Washington, DC. NRCS 1999. Grassland Birds. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management leaflet. United State Department of Agriculture. NRCS, Natural Resource Conservation Service. Wild life Management Institute. Perrins, C. M. and Birkhead, T. R. (1983). Avian Ecology. Blackie. Glasgow and London. New York. Rahmani, A. R. 1998. The Banni grassland: Natural resource under siege. Sanctuary Asia. XVIII (3). pp- 40-49. Rotenberry, J. T. and J. A. Wiens. 1980. Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology, 61: pp-1228–1250. Singh, A., Singh Laura J. 2012. Avian and Plant Species Diversity and their Inter-relationship in Tilyar Lake, Rohtak (Haryana). Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 1808 Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci.; Volume 1 [9]. Pp- 65 – 68. Sateesh Pujari and Estari Mamidala (2015). Anti-diabetic activity of Physagulin-F isolated from Physalis angulata fruits. The Ame J Sci & Med Res, 2015,1(1):53-60. Tiwari, J. K and A. R. Rahmani 1998. The Banni grassland. In A study on the ecology of grasslands of the Indian plains with particular reference to their endangered fauna. Bombay Natural History Society and Center of Wildlife and Ornithology. Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C. T., Beebee, J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and F. Barlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: pp-389-395. Ware, D. M. and R. E. Thomson. 2000. Interannual to multi decadal climate variations in the Northeast Pacific. Journal of Climate 13: pp- 3209-3220. WATTS, B. D. 1996. Social strategy and cover in Savannah Sparrows. Auk, 113: pp- 960–963. Welty, J. C. and Baptista L. 1988. In: The life of birds, fourth edition. Saunders College Publishing. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney, Tokyo.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».