An Interactive Communication Model for Self-Care—Regardless of Health Literacy: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Clear dialogue-based (interactive) communication that ensures comprehension and recall becomes more important in patient-provider interactions, especially in relation to patients with chronic diseases, where self-management education and counseling are cornerstones in managing these diseases. If patients with chronic disease experience challenges in obtaining, understanding, and applying health-related information (necessary to make informed health decisions and sufficiently manage their health), clear communication and ensuring comprehension become even more critical in the patient-provider interactions. Furthermore, patient-provider communication has been proposed as a potential pathway through which health literacy might influence health outcomes, especially in individuals with chronic diseases. Hence, adjusting communication to the individual level of health literacy might have a positive influence on health outcomes. On this basis, the authors have developed a web-based interactive communication model that both seeks to accommodate health literacy by allowing tailored communication and ensure comprehension and recall between nurses and patients. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to examine the use of an IT solution that comprises an interactive communication model that seeks to accommodate health literacy in communication and ensure comprehension and recall between nurses and patients. METHODS: A quasi-experimental control group study including full economic evaluation with 6-month follow-up. Based on power calculation, a total of 82 participants will be included. Participants are assigned either the interactive communication model (intervention) or usual nursing care. It will be assessed if the model influences the level of health literacy and participants experience a higher health-related quality of life. Further, cost-effectiveness will be evaluated. Overall, the statistical methods will follow an intention-to-treat principle. Results will be presented in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs guidelines for nonrandomized designs as well as the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. RESULTS: This paper describes a protocol for a clustered quasi-experimental control study that seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of the interactive communicative model. Most studies in the field of health literacy are epidemiological studies that seek to address the effects of poor health literacy in populations and its potential impact on health inequity. A total of 82 participants, who receive community nursing will be included. The final trial day is May 1, 2022, with the first report of results in the final quarter of 2022. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the trial can create the base for conducting a large-scale study and inspire the conduction of more studies that seeks to create and evaluate interventions aimed at enhancing the level of health literacy and reducing the usage of health resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04929314; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04929314. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/37673.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,054 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».