MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4321354165 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.0009

Putting Politics Aside: The Congressional Baseball Game

2023· article· en· W4321354165 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dylan Garvin, Rick Burton

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCONTESTPoliticsAsidePresidential systemLegislaturePolitical scienceLawMedia studiesSociologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Putting Politics AsideThe Congressional Baseball Game Dylan Garvin (bio) and Rick Burton (bio) overview For many Americans, watching representatives from the two major US political parties locked in fierce political battles is nothing new. And while legislative disagreements and challenges have traditionally taken place inside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, the two parties that have dominated American politics for more than 150 years have annually taken their combative spirit to nearby settings (most recently Washington Nationals Park) to settle their perceived and very real differences via competitive baseball. This contest, the Congressional Baseball Game (CBG) played between Democrats and Republicans in the nation’s capital, stands as an American cultural tradition unlike almost any other. Despite receiving limited national media coverage, this annual baseball event serves as a symbolic strand in America’s foundational and social DNA. From a historical standpoint, the Congressional Baseball Game started as a friendly competition between the two opposing parties. It has since grown into a significant public fundraising event raising millions of dollars for various charitable causes. It has also enjoyed visitations from sitting American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, the first to attend the game in 1917. Years later Dwight D. Eisenhower threw out the first pitch for the 1953 contest.1 The most recent presidential attendee was Joe Biden, who made a brief appearance during the 2021 game.2 The CBG has also showcased three future presidents. Both the thirty- eighth president, Gerald Ford, and forty- first, George H. W. Bush, played for the Republican team during their time in the House of Representatives. Ford is credited with hitting the first recorded grand slam in the game’s history in 1957.3 Bush, who captained Yale’s baseball team during his time in New Haven, Connecticut, was a mainstay in the Republicans’ infield during his two terms [End Page 89] in Congress (1967–71).4 The third future president to play in the game, Joe Biden, is the only Democratic president to do so. Biden made three appearances during his time in the Senate and during the 1974 matchup wore a Philadelphia Phillies uniform, which he described as having been “stolen” from the team. The uniform happened to be the number forty- six, the same number as his future presidency.5 Interestingly, since its inception more than 112 years ago, the game has built a distinct political legacy filled with numerous narrative twists and turns, perhaps befitting of a game that has often been described as America’s national pastime. The game has also featured former professional baseball players, including a National Baseball Hall of Fame member, widely celebrated as one of the greatest major league pitchers ever. But of all the politicians to ever play the game, the best player ever to compete in the congressional game (by a wide margin) never played past the inter-collegiate (NCAA) level. the father of the game The first game between congressional Democrats and Republicans took place in 1909. This initial contest was organized by John Tener, a first-year congressman from Pennsylvania and former Major League Baseball (MLB) player. The event was designed as a change of pace for the lawmakers, who were used to contesting legislation within the walls of the Capitol, but as the proposed game date drew closer, members became more excited.6 At the price of seventy-five cents per ticket, more than one thousand attendees filed into Washington’s American League Park to watch something far removed from an elite baseball game. In staging the game, however, the modestly talented politicians could suggest their patriotism (by playing America’s symbolic game) but also show a “down- home” linkage to their constituencies (by rolling up their figurative sleeves and taking turns in the batter’s box). This first game ended after a full seven innings with the Democrats’ 26– 16 victory. The Associated Press summed the game up by claiming, “More varieties of baseball were played in that game than [were] ever crowded into seven innings before.”7 The game included fourteen errors in total, nine by the Republicans. The Washington Times (which was published between 1894 and 1939 and should not be confused with the contemporary conservative...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,333
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,941

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0600,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207