MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4321354171 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.0000

The Cheap Seats: A Note from the Editor

2023· article· en· W4321354171 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Willie Steele

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMonsterMedia studiesArt historySingingArtHistoryVisual artsSociologyManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Cheap SeatsA Note from the Editor Willie Steele Three years since my last visit to the Baseball Hall of Fame— with the annual Cooperstown Symposium on Baseball History and Culture being canceled in 2020 and shifted to online for 2021— I started writing this note from the deck of my hotel, overlooking Lake Otsego in June 2022. Twenty- four hours ago, I was sitting with my college roommate in the bleachers at Fenway Park, my first game at the iconic park, which opened in 1912. Red Sox fan and noted baseball writer Bill Nowlin gave us access to see the view from the top of the Green Monster in left field and took us to the press box where we listened to him and the Red Sox official scorekeeper reminisce about the games they’ve seen there, the most notable of which was Carlton Fisk’s home run in Game Six of the 1975 World Series. Five nights later, my niece and I were at Wrigley Field, where I finally got to watch my first game there. Sitting in a box above home plate, a friend turned to me and said, “Think of all the history here. Babe Ruth played on this field!” But when they played a video of Harry Caray singing “Take Me Out to the Ball Game” during the seventh inning stretch, I was suddenly twelve years old watching a game on WGN during the few times a year when I could see my Pittsburgh Pirates play on television, singing along with the beloved announcer. It was fitting that my return to Cooperstown be bookended by trips to these iconic ballparks. The four days at the Hall of Fame reminded me of all that has changed in the world, and in baseball, since the spring of 2020. Several of the restaurants and businesses along Main Street have either permanently closed or are open for limited hours, I’m told having fallen victim to the limited visitors during the pandemic. But while the vibe in the village might be a bit different, the exhibits in the Hall of Fame both reassure me of baseball’s ability to survive difficult times and reflect some significant changes that continue taking place in the game. [End Page ix] While I might not be ready to embrace changes like the “ghost runner” rule or the universal designated hitter (that’s a reflection of me growing up a fan of the National League), seeing more women in front office and coaching roles is something that was long overdue. Now that I’ve returned from the trip and am organizing this issue of NINE, I’m reminded once again of how great the game’s history is, warts and all. In these pages you will read about baseball during World War I, various aspects of the Negro Leagues and Black players, the intersection of baseball and politics, and how former players turned visual artists provide a lens through which we can understand psychology. Alongside the traditional articles you are used to reading in this journal, we also include something new: “Loved It or Loathed It,” in which we allow two readers to provide their contrasting views of an iconic baseball book. The idea came from NINE board member and contributor Mitchell Nathanson and is meant to provide readers with a way of rethinking some of the more significant books in the game’s literary history. Our hope is that this new addition will be less like when the White Sox wore shorts as part of their uniform in 1976 and more like when the first major league game was broadcast on the radio in 1921. It will enhance something we think is already pretty solid. Back in Fenway, right about the time my friend and I started thinking the game had changed too much for our liking, a kid who was about eight years old and wearing a Xander Bogaerts jersey stained with chili from his hot dog looked down the row of seats at a random guy wearing a Yankees hat. The boy, leaning over a woman I assumed was his mom, yelled, “Hey! New York sucks!” Without missing a beat...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,073
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,989

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207