Using leaf chlorophyll observations to improve carbon cycle modelling at a temperate mixed forest
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Understanding the interactions between atmosphere and vegetation in changing climatic conditions is important so that we can predict the carbon sequestration potential of ecosystems. Helpful tools here are the terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs), since they include detailed ecophysiological process descriptions, e.g. the manifold interactions between the carbon and nitrogen cycles. However, the modelling of the nitrogen cycle poses challenges and having observational constraints on nitrogen cycle is crucial. Current remote sensing products offer estimates of leaf chlorophyll (Cab), that is related to the nitrogen cycle. In this study we want to assess how useful Cab observations are at site scale to constrain a TBM. In this work we are studying a temperate mixed forest, Borden, located in Canada. We use a TBM QUantifying Interactions between terrestrial Nutrient Cycles, QUINCY, to model this site. From the site we have long-term (20 years) flux tower and LAI (from PAR measurements) observations together with leaf level observations of leaf chlorophyll (Cab), leaf nitrogen, and photochemical parameters of maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and maximum potential electron transport rate (Jmax). The QUINCY model was predicting too late leaf senescence, which we tuned using the site level data. The amount of leaf nitrogen was originally quite successfully simulated by QUINCY, but the amount of simulated Cab was too low. Matching the simulated Cab values with the observations did not have a pronounced effect on the GPP. Additionally, the development of LAI and Cab were originally fully coupled in QUINCY, whereas the observations showed a delayed development of Cab compared to LAI. When we implemented this decoupling between LAI and Cab, an improvement of simulated GPP compared to the observations was found. Also then the simulated Vcmax and Jmax showed better correspondence to the observations. Assessment of the long-term behaviour of the model at the site showed that the model was able to capture the drought-induced drawdown of carbon fluxes taking place in 2007. The observations showed an increase in the component fluxes of carbon during the time period, but this was not replicated by the model. The start of season (SOS) and end of season (EOS) were estimated from both the simulated and observed GPP and LAI using a simple threshold method. The model was more successful in capturing the changes in the growing season metrics estimated by LAI than by GPP. The model was predicting too late onset of GPP in many years, but captured largely the interannual variation of SOS in observed GPP. This study paves the way for work using remotely sensed leaf chlorophyll in evaluation and improvement of the QUINCY model.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».