Method to quantify hydrological alterations due to anthropogenic interventions: A case study of Peace River, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hydrological alteration refers to any modification to different components of the natural flow regime of a river that human interventions may cause. The interventions are built to store excess water for different purposes, such as hydropower generation, irrigation, and domestic uses. The headwaters of the Peace River in Canada that flows from the Rocky Mountains of British Columbia became regulated by two large dams, the W. A. C. Bennett dam in 1968 and the Peace Canyon dam in 1980. The objective of the paper quantified the hydrological alterations caused by the cascade of dams across the Peace River. We have used a powerful tool 'River Flow Health Index' to quantify the alterations in different flow regime components on a 0-1 scale (0 means unaltered and one means completely altered). Historical hydrological data is obtained from the Water Survey of Canada (http://www.ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/) at a gauge station, Peace River near Taylor (coordinates: 56° 8'8.99"N, 120°40'13.01"W) for the years 1945-2015. 1945-1962 is chosen as the reference state because the dams were constructed after 1963. The altered period is referred to the period 1970-2015 after the operation of the dams started. We scrutinized 171 hydrologically relevant parameters grouped into seven components of the flow regime: magnitude, variability, duration, frequency, timing, rate of change, and others. The methodology for estimating the River Flow Health Index (RFHI) consists of four steps: (1) segregation of the flow data based on preimpact and postimpact periods, (2) identification of important hydrological parameters, (3) assessment of the alterations, and (4) development of an index indicating the health of the river flow during the altered period on a 0–1 scale. The flow health of the river changed significantly due to the dams, with an overall alteration of 0.897. The degree of alterations in different components of the flow regime is magnitude (0.646), variability (0.978), duration (0.941), frequency (1.000), timing (0.978), rate of change (0.801), and others (1.000).Daily flows at the downstream site during 1945–2015 reveal substantial reductions in flows after the construction of the W. A. C. Bennett and Peace Canyon dams. Homogenization of flows in the post-impact period altered the variability component of the flow regime. The duration and frequency of the extreme events are stunted post-dam regulation. This might result from water storage and release, and these multiple dams can store and attenuate all high-and low-pulse events. Alterations in the timing component resulted in the seasonal shift in streamflow by storing flood flows and releasing or utilizing them during lean seasons. Changes in Group 6, i.e., rate of change after the construction of the dams, indicate dam operations for energy production (i.e., peaking operations). Thus, the results indicate that the large dams across the Peace River can substantially change the natural flow regime. Our results may help upgrade the design and implementation of reservoir operation policies that consider downstream hydrological alterations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».