Open Government Scan of Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Policies and practices that foster government openness and citizen participation are widely recognised as important contributors to a robust democracy.The results of the OECD's first Trust Survey (2022) show that governments across the OECD are seen by many as unresponsive to public feedback and as providing insufficient opportunities to participate in policy making.The findings highlight that citizens care about having a government that offers access to government information, provides opportunities to engage in the policy-making process and responds to public feedback and demands.Canada is widely recognised as a global leader in the area of open government thanks to its cochairmanship of the Steering Committee of the OGP in 2018 -2019 and continued involvement as a Steering Committee member until 2023, as well as the country's highly developed open data and open information agenda, which includes practices such as the renowned Open Government Portal.To continue making progress towards an integrated open government agenda and, more specifically, to receive tailored advice on the design of the country's first-ever holistic open government strategy, the Canadian government requested the support of the OECD in identifying the strengths and opportunities for improvement of its current agenda to open up the government.The OECD Open Government Scan of Canada takes stock of past reform efforts, analyses the present scenario and shows a path for Canada to successfully design, implement, monitor and evaluate this open government strategy.The Scan provides an evidence-based assessment of the country's frameworks for and governance of open government reforms and their implementation against selected provisions of the OECD Recommendation of the Council on Open Government (2017).The Scan benefitted from more than 20 interviews with governmental and non-public stakeholders, data collected through questionnaires answered by the Federal government, and extensive desk research by the OECD Secretariat.The Scan finds that the adoption of a holistic federal open government strategy can indeed help Canada set a vision, objectives, and a narrative for its open government agenda in the medium and long term.In addition to opening the door for promoting more far-reaching governance mechanisms and tools, such as the country's first maturity models in the field of open government, the Strategy presents an opportunity to broaden Canada's understanding of open government.This means addressing citizen and stakeholder participation more, while also linking open government reforms more directly with improving citizens' trust in public institutions and strengthening democracy.The OECD Open Government Scan of Canada recommends concrete actions for Canada to consider in the short, medium and long term to strengthen the enabling environment for open government and to design a successful open government strategy.Ultimately, the recommendations aim to support Canada in the move towards a fully integrated open government ecosystem.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».