Geometries and kinematics of fault systems in the Flemish Pass Basin: Insights from the Bay du Nord 3D seismic survey, offshore Newfoundland, Eastern Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Flemish Pass Basin is a Mesozoic basin offshore Newfoundland in Eastern Canada. This basin has proven petroleum systems, and formed via multiple rifting episodes as a part of the wider North Atlantic rift system during Pangaea’s disintegration. We utilise the Bay du Nord 3D seismic survey to derive 3D fault models, which include throws profile. The aim of this was to investigate fault nucleation and growth history, and how this may relate to previous interpretations of multi-stage rifting, plus the possible role of structural inheritance in controlling basin evolution.Through our interpretation of the 3D volume, we identified three fault systems (1: NE-SW, 2: NW-SE & 3: NNE-SSW), plus one distinctive basin-bounding fault (trending E-W). The NE-SW basement-involved system typically comprises 12 – 17 km long faults dipping 10–25o, with throws of 250–1250 m. This fault system exhibits throws of 600–1250 m between the hanging wall and footwall of the interpreted Pre–Mesozoic cut–off horizon. We interpret this observation of large throw values to relate to the initiation of extension following the Pre-Mesozoic horizon, which likely coincides with the previously interpreted regional Late Triassic–Early Jurassic rift phase. Moreover, although lower throws (≤200 m) were recorded between the Base Upper Tithonian and Late Jurassic horizons, evidence of reactivation of this fault system is interpreted from the throw values, which range from 300–750 m between the Base Upper Tithonian and the Aptian horizons. We interpret this to result from further reactivation due to the previously interpreted 2nd regional rift phase in the Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous. The NW-SE fault system constitutes 3 – 10 km long planar normal faults, with throws ranging from 50–300 m scattered between the Base Upper Tithonian and Late Cretaceous cut-off lines. We interpret that this fault set propagated downward and linked with pre-existing basement-involved faults, and that the nucleation of this fault set occurred during the 2nd rift phase. The NNE-SSW planar normal fault system is interpreted to be younger based on stratigraphic relationships and comprises 2–8 km long faults. This fault system was interpreted to correspond with the 3rd rift phase during the Cretaceous, and has throw values between the Base Upper Tithonian and the Base Cretaceous horizons ranging from 100–350 m. Finally, the distinct E-W striking basin-bounding normal fault revealed throws of 250–4000 m. This fault acts as a sub-basin confinement on the southern part of the 3D survey area, with throw variation distributed in the Pre-Mesozoic horizon from 1000–4000 m and between Base Upper Tithonian–Aptian Cretaceous horizons with values of 250-800 m.Overall, our results demonstrate that: 1) in the Flemish Pass basin, there are three fault systems, and one distinctive basin-bounding fault, all of which display variable throw values corresponding to three rift phases (Late Triassic-Early Jurassic, Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous, and Cretaceous) and 2) pre-existing structures influenced basin development by providing an initial seed for subsequent faulting and may have possibly formed a mechanical link aiding propagation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».