Evaluating Backwater versus Upstream Tectonic Controls on the Gravel-Sand Transition, Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin is a well-characterized source-to sink system that extends for about 1000 km from proximal gravelly alluvial systems in the Liard Basin, Northwest Territories, to well-developed sandy deltaic and prodelta muddy shelf systems in Alberta. The mud to sand transition has been well-documented and the sandy deltas have been shown to be fed by tributive incised valley systems driven by cycles of high frequency sea-level change. These incised valleys in turn pass landward into the conglomerate alluvial systems, but the nature of these conglomerates and the controls on the gravel-sand transition have not been well examined.Dunvegan conglomerates in outcrops in the Liard Basin are moderately-sorted and well- rounded reaching up to small cobbles in size. These have previously been interpreted as alluvial fans; however, our investigations show a domination of sharp to scoured based meters-thick fining upward facies successions consisting of dune- and bar- scale cross stratification. The conglomeratic units comprise highly amalgamated channel belt deposits that form cliff exposures that are about 70 m high. There is an absence of debris flows or of sedimentary structures characteristic of supercritical flows, and we thus interpret these as likely deposited by meters-deep lower-gradient gravel-bed streams, rather than steep-gradient, sheet-flood dominated alluvial fans.Trunk channels in the sink area, farther to the southeast are associated with incised valleys and have a mean bankfull depth of 10-15 m, carry medium sand (< 200 microns) with slopes estimated to be on the order of 6x 10-5. Source to sink calculations indicate a back-water length of around 200 kilometers. Based on paleogeographic reconstructions, the conglomerates appear to have been deposited 300 to 500 km from the mapped deltaic shorelines, indicating that the gravel sand transition is not related to the back water and is likely not controlled by sea-level changes, thought to be important in generating the incised valleys in the sink area. The conglomerates appear to be confined within the Liard Basin, which is bounded to the east by the Bovie Fault, expressed as a major kilometer-throw normal fault. The Bovie structure was long-lived and may have been active throughout Dunvegan time. Hence, excess accommodation, driven by movement on the Bovie Fault may have prevented gravel from escaping into the more distal parts of the Western Canada Sedimentary basin. This is in contrast to other clastic wedges in the Cretaceous Interior Seaway, such as the Frontier and Cardium formations, that contain conglomeratic shoreline and shelf deposits and may indicate steeper gradient S2S systems.Tectonics and climate in the Dunvegan drainage basin may not have been linked to processes downstream because of the Bovie Fault. Despite clear evidence of downstream sea-level controls in the Dunvegan sink, it does not appear that these signals were able to propagate upstream.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».