MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322392827 · doi:10.1353/art.2022.0051

The United States of Medievalism ed. by Tison Pugh and Susan Aronstein

2022· article· en· W4322392827 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David R. Matthews

Notice bibliographique

RevueArthuriana · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedievalismHistoryMiddle AgesClassicsColonialismArt historyArtAncient historyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The United States of Medievalism ed. by Tison Pugh and Susan Aronstein David Matthews tison pugh and susan aronstein, eds., The United States of Medievalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. x, 323. isbn: 978-1-4875-2508-8. $44.95. Few readers these days will blink at what might once have been thought a paradox in such a title as this. It is well known that western colonial settler cultures have routinely imposed versions of the Middle Ages wherever they have gone, and so it is that travellers will come across the medieval hyperreal where indigenous peoples might once have been. Still, while the neo-Gothic cathedrals of the eastern seaboard and the neo-chivalric aspirations of the pre-war South might be fairly well known, the sheer reach and breadth of medievalism in the present-day US is what impresses here. 'It would be a virtually impossible task,' the editors aver in a brief and crisp introduction, 'to tally the complete range of American medievalisms.' The land is 'dotted with tourist castles and neo-Gothic college campuses, as well as with medieval fairs, museums, cathedrals …' (p. 8). The book is arranged in three parts. The first, 'Building the American Middle Ages,' starts us off on relatively familiar ground in the north-east and Kathleen Coyne Kelly on the 'medievalized gardens' of Boston and Cambridge. It moves on to ecclesiastical buildings in Philadelphia in the hands of Kevin J. Harty. Proceeding amusingly into Dan Brown territory, Laurie Finke describes the Masonic medievalism of Washington, D.C. Then Alfred Thomas takes a look at 'Medieval Chicago' through architecture, patronage, and capital, propounding the strong thesis that far from resisting capital, architectural medievalism celebrated it. Part Two, 'Living in the American Middle Ages,' takes us south and west but also into New York City—where Candace Barrington walks through the stations of the cross as they were constructed in a 2018 public art installation. Richard Utz polemically looks at knighthood and race in modern Atlanta; Jana K. Schulman goes to Minnesota and its Viking heritage, while Alison Gulley details 'Searching for Salvation in Medieval Appalachia.' Rounding out the section, Lowell Gallagher's chapter 'Wounded Landscapes: Topographies of Franciscan Spirituality and Deep Ecology in California Medievalism' pursues, completely counter-intuitively, the San Andreas fault (dramatically pictured on the essay's second page) as 'a topographical medium aevum born of the fissuring and interpretively opaque space-time of the in-between' (p. 199). Strap yourselves in: this is the wildest ride in the whole book. Part Three, 'Playing in the American Middle Ages,' begins with the editors' own contribution, 'Orlando's Medieval Heritage Project'; Candace Barrington reappears, co-writing with Usha Vishnuvajjala on New Orleans, which they [End Page 157] playfully but persuasively suggest is 'perhaps the most medieval of American cities' (p. 246). Lorraine Kochanske Stock, playing medievalism-anthropologist, goes among the players of 'Medieval May-Games, Robin Hood Revels, and "Pleasure Faires" in Contemporary Texas.' Finally, the well-known writing team of Laurie Finke and Martin Shichtman 'Get Medieval' in Sin City. Las Vegas is well known for its 'built medievalisms,' which constitute a 'layer of unironic pastiche through which visitors are invited to circulate.' But this is not a tour of those medievalisms and the premise is rather that the medievalism of Vegas 'resides less in its hyperreal reproductions of medieval sites … than in its structural function in creating and maintaining a pilgrimage site for sin, where desperate people flock to be healed of their sickness. …' As with Chaucer's Canterbury pilgrimage, 'the Vegas pilgrimage promises to heal …' (p. 285). The essay pursues this premise increasingly persuasively and brings the book to a triumphant close. There is no afterword or attempt to sum up. There does not need to be. It is clear the editors have not imposed a style and there is wide variation of approach. Some of the essays are quite descriptive and content to sit back somewhat from whatever the medievalism in question might be doing (Coyne Kelly, Schulman). Others are more overtly polemical (Utz, Thomas). Some are more personal and experiential (notably, Barrington on New York City). Others still adopt more overtly theorized...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,066
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,221

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0660,023

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,193
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArthurianaMême sujetMedieval Literature and HistoryTravaux en français237 207