MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322393013 · doi:10.1353/gpq.2022.0024

Making a Difference: My Fight for Native Rights and Social Justice by Ada Deer

2022· article· en· W4322393013 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allyson Stevenson

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreat plains quarterly · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousPoliticsEconomic JusticeColonialismSovereigntySociologyFourth WorldLawGender studiesEthnologyPolitical scienceHistoryCriminology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Making a Difference: My Fight for Native Rights and Social Justice by Ada Deer Allyson Stevenson Making a Difference: My Fight for Native Rights and Social Justice. By Ada Deer, with Theda Perdue. Foreword by Charles Wilkinson. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2019. ix + 189 pp. Illustrations, index. $26.95 cloth. Scholars interested in the twentieth-century history of Native American political activism will find the autobiography of Ada Deer essential reading. Making a Difference covers a critical period in the modern struggle for tribal sovereignty. Ada Deer, a Menominee woman, played a valuable role in restoring her community's lands and tribal sovereignty after termination, as well as in protecting tribal interests at the national level. As she narrates her life, reflects on her familial and tribal influences while evaluating her legacy, Deer presents readers with the opportunity to witness the exceptional contribution of a highly educated and dynamic Menominee activist. I happened to read Making a Difference immediately after completing Brenda Child's Holding Our World Together: Ojibwe Women and the Survival of Community (2013). Despite the differences in approach, and tribal affiliation, both books contribute to a growing field that increasingly centers Indigenous women's unacknowledged roles in preserving communities, culture, and families. Whether as exceptional individuals as in the case of Deer, or as mothers, grandmothers, and cultural knowledge holders, Native American women have sustained and continue to sustain connections to lands, languages, and bodies of knowledge that have undergone continued assault from colonial times onward. Growing up in poverty on the beautiful Menominee reservation, but nevertheless provided a deep sense of social justice from her non-Native American mother, Ada Deer's pursuit of Native rights stems from her commitment to Native American sovereignty promised in the treaties with the United States government. Assisted by historian Theda Perdue, Ada Deer's autobiography spans the period from her birth in 1935 and early years on the Menominee reservation in Wisconsin, through her successful role in advocating for restoration of the Menominee's lands and tribal status, and concludes with her time in Washington, DC, as assistant secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs during the Clinton administration. Throughout the book, we are privy to Ada's reflections and we witness her driving ambition to see Native American tribes, systems of governance, and economies be restored through a relationship to the government based on recognition of Native American sovereignty and self-determination. For readers, it would be helpful to have appendices that include the treaty documents that enshrine the Menominee rights. In addition, as much of her politization stems from the Menominee termination, the book would also benefit from having both the termination acts and restoration acts likewise included for those [End Page 265] interested. Finally, in situating the Menominee people in their tribal homelands, maps to accompany this work would provide the reader with the geographical context that provides much of the specificity of the Menominee tribe's homeland. Allyson Stevenson Department of Indigenous Studies University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Copyright © 2023 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,684
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreat plains quarterlyMême sujetVietnamese History and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207