Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Potentiality, Transformation, Struggle: Seeds During the summer of 1918 in the United States, Rudhyar found himself at a crossroads: he could either continue to improve his piano technique and become a professional accompanist, or do something more drastic. Many years later he recalled in his autobiography that he “simply could not follow such a professional course with all it implied.” Then something happened the same year: he met Leopold Stokowski in Ottawa when the French-Canadian pianist and composer, Alfred Laliberté, who was living in Montreal, invited Rudhyar to give lectures: “It was while in Toronto that Mr. [Siegfried] Herz—a piano dealer— took Rudhyar to Ottawa to meet Stokowski, then conductor of the Philadelphia Orchestra.” After meeting Rudhyar, Stokowski not only took him to an official reception at the governor's palace in Ottawa but also suggested that he come to Philadelphia to attend some of the rehearsals and concerts of the orchestra led by Stokowski. But when Rudhyar gave him the orchestral score of one of his early works, the conductor decided that it would be better to perform a more mature composition later. According to Rudhyar, this never happened because Stokowski “was never eager to give [him] a chance later on,” telling him that “he was many years ahead of his time.” In retrospect, Rudhyar would often regard this period as a pivotal point in his life: “A door was opened, and I stepped through. It turned out to be a cathartic step—the psychic ploughing under of what remained of old values and a tragic awareness of the darkness of roots and what was left of the Romantic pride: ‘a dark night with the soul.’” These early years were indeed marked by uncertainty, instability, and transformation for Rudhyar. His poem, “Anguish” (originally written in French during the winter of 1919, later translated by him into English, “though not quite as evocative as in French”), reflects the dark sense of tribulation of this Romantic feeling to which he was referring: … One would love to shout: but what for? No one would hear or, hearing, would only smile and shrug shoulders with the miserable scorn of happy people. And this will last, year after year, perhaps forever. If it should end, for what new anguish, new agony? And after so often dying, every minute dying, how will one ever know what is the real death?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,066 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».