Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ostensibly to add to the rather paltry Labour representation in the House of Lords, maybe also in a futile attempt to pre-empt an old Radical's propensity to embarrass the government, or perhaps simply to reward a long-serving and courageous politician, who also happened to have been a friend of the prime minister for over thirty years, Wedgwood was ennobled, along with three Labour colleagues, in the New Year's Honours List of December 1941 (Ralph Wedgwood received a baronetcy at the same time). He had been offered a peerage by Churchill, via Lord Halifax in the Washington embassy, while he was touring America in June 1941. Perhaps forgetting that he had once referred to the House of Lords as, ‘an eighteenth-century mummy, which stood for the vested interests against the public, which impeded progress, and had no constituents to keep it straight’, he replied that he was delighted to accept. Unfortunately his advice to the senator to ‘go soak his head’ then meant that the prime minister had to defer Wedgwood's ennoblement until the end of the year. Wedgwood's first thoughts on being made a peer were for the future not of his baronial seat – which would in time pass to his eldest son Charles – but of his parliamentary seat, which he rather hoped would pass to his younger son, Josiah. But young Josiah had once promised the directors of the Wedgwood Pottery that he would not leave for a political career, and now, as managing director, and with a factory to rebuild, he kept his word. At his inauguration to the Lords, Wedgwood – now the first Baron Wedgwood of Barlaston – promised that the first issue that he would raise would be Britain's bad attitude towards the Jews. It was an apposite promise, not least as of the 273 congratulatory messages he received from around the world many, probably most, came from Jewish well-wishers. The Detroit Jewish Chronicle , in an eighteen-column-inch encomium, described him, along with Jan Smuts, as ‘the outstanding friend of the Zionist cause’ among Christian statesmen. It was not to be long before Wedgwood got his chance to raise Jewish matters in his new political home.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,614 | 0,529 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».