Utility of Inter-Frequency Amplitude Ratio of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Identifying Meniere’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: A recently devised parameter of vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) based on the principles of frequency tuning is the inter-frequency amplitude ratio (IFAR). It refers to the ratio of the amplitude of 1000 Hz tone burst evoked VEMP to 500 Hz evoked tone burst. A pathology like Meniere's disease changes the frequency response and alters the frequency tuning of the otolith organs. Because IFAR is based on the principle of frequency tuning of VEMP, it is likely to help identify Meniere's disease. Few studies in the last decade have investigated the utility of IFAR in identifying Meniere's disease. However, a systematic review and a meta-analysis on IFAR in Meniere's disease are lacking. The present study investigates whether the IFAR of VEMP helps identify Meniere's disease and differentiates it from healthy ears and other vestibular pathologies. DESIGN: The present study is a systematic review and a meta-analysis. The studies investigating the IFAR of cervical and ocular VEMPs in Meniere's disease, healthy controls, and other vestibular pathologies were searched across research databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. The search strategy was developed using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) format, and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and Boolean operators were employed. The systematic review was performed using the Rayyan software, whereas the Review Manager software was used to carry out the meta-analysis. A total of 16,605 articles were retrieved from the databases. After the duplicate removal, 2472 articles remained. These were eliminated using title screening, abstract screening, and full-length inspections. A total of nine articles were found eligible for quality assessment and meta-analysis, and the New Castle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. After the data extraction, 24 six articles were found to have the desired data format for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher IFAR in the affected ears of individuals in the Meniere's disease group than in the control group's unaffected ears. There was no significant difference between the unaffected ears of individuals in the Meniere's disease group and the ears of the control group. The only study on Meniere's disease and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo found significantly larger ocular VEMP IFAR in ears with Meniere's disease than in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found IFAR efficient in differentiating Meniere's disease from healthy controls. We also found an enhanced IFAR as a potential marker for Meniere's disease. However, more investigations are needed to confirm the utility of an enhanced IFAR value in the exclusive identification of Meniere's disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».