MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322769852 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p3-04-02

Abstract P3-04-02: Population level access to diagnostic mammography and ultrasound guided breast biopsy in Nigeria: a geospatial analysis

2023· article· en· W4322769852 sur OpenAlexaff
Adeleye Dorcas Omisore, Elizabeth J. Sutton, Gavin Tansley, Gregory Knapp

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Établissements canadiensDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMammographyBreast cancerGeospatial analysisPopulationPublic healthBreast imagingBreast cancer screeningFamily medicineEnvironmental healthCancerNursingGeographyCartographyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Nigeria. Physical proximity to a diagnostic center is an important component of access, which has direct implication on the cost and timeliness of diagnosis and treatment. Beyond diagnostic mammography, ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy is an essential tool in the diagnostic pathway for suspicious lesions of the breast and is recommended by the Whole Health Organization Breast Health Global Initiative for LMICs. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of data on the population level access to mammography and US-guided breast biopsy in Nigeria and little is known about the geospatial inequities in access that targeted programming or investment could potentially address. This study undertook a comprehensive evaluation of breast imaging and diagnostic services in Nigeria and using a previously validated geographic information system (GIS) model, evaluated geospatial access to diagnostic mammography and US-guided breast biopsy in Nigeria. Methods: A comprehensive list of public and private facilities offering diagnostic mammography and/or US-guided breast biopsy was compiled using publicly available facility data from the Nigerian Ministry of Health, a survey administered to members of the Breast Imaging Society of Nigeria (BISON) as well as key stakeholder interviews from each of the countries six geopolitical zones. A novel survey was delivered to BISON members to identify additional/new facilities not captured by the latest Nigerian Ministry of Health data. Facility location, administration (public vs. private) and duration of service delivery were elicited from respondents and paired with the Ministry of Health facility dataset. Data on provider training and volume were also captured in the survey. All facilities were geolocated using Google Earth™ (Google, Mountain View, CA). A previously described cost-distance model, that uses open-source population density data to 100m2 (GeoData Institute) and road network data (OpenStreetMap) was used to estimate population level travel time to the nearest diagnostic center. Any portion of a route that included travel over terrain without roads was assigned a walking speed of 5 kmh-1. Geospatial access was calculated for mammography and US-guided biopsy separately and as well as by geopolitical zone. This study was approved by the research ethics board at Obafemi Awolowo University. Results: In addition to publicly available data from the Ministry of Health, facility and practice data was obtained from 63 Nigerian Radiologists from across the country. In total, 124 centers were identified that offer diagnostic mammography, of which 78 (63%) are privately administered. Nine of the countries 36 states did not have a center offering this service. Across the country, 33 centers offer US-guided breast biopsy, of which the majority (72.7%) are public. At a population level, 83.1% of the population has access within 120 minutes of continuous one-way travel to a center with diagnostic mammogram or US. At 240 minutes of continuous one-way travel, which corresponds to a full day of travel round-trip, 80.8% of the population has access to US-guided breast biopsy. However, there are differences in access between geopolitical zones. Just 68.7% of the population in the North East geopolitical zone has access to US-guided biopsy within a day’s travel (i.e. 240 minutes one-way). The remaining five geopolitical zones have population level access to this service of ≥80%. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive evaluation of breast cancer imaging and diagnostic services in Nigeria. Our results, demonstrate that the majority of the population in Nigeria has reasonable geospatial access to basic breast cancer imaging services. However, there are inequalities in access between states and geopolitical zones in the north and south of the country, which may have an impact on timely diagnosis and care. Citation Format: Adeleye Omisore, Elizabeth J. Sutton, Gavin Tansley, Rachael Adeyanju AKINOLA, Gregory Knapp. Population level access to diagnostic mammography and ultrasound guided breast biopsy in Nigeria: a geospatial analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-04-02.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,057
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,114

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,241
Tête enseignante GPT0,487
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Research→Même sujetGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening→Travaux en français237 207→