Abstract P6-05-59A: Developing a Community Standard of Care for Individuals Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Patients Across Oregon
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Early in the pandemic, cancer centers across the nation and Oregon canceled their cancer support programs as non-essential medical care. Breast cancer patients were forced to look elsewhere for essential assistance and community support to move along their cancer journeys. Pink Lemonade Project (PLP), a Vancouver, WA based community based nonprofit, helped fill the gaps and expanded its local support for breast cancer patients. A virtual format allowed PLP to serve more individuals with our psychological, emotional and financial support programs. Next, PLP convened an informal coalition of all the local breast cancer support organizations including those that offer breast cancer support programs, community including dragon boating and rowing, and others that serve broader communities and more people of color. Then, as Komen National announced its restructuring, and closed the Oregon-Southwest Washington affiliate in Spring 2021, Pink Lemonade Project stepped up again to maintain two locally-grown Komen programs that met critical community need–the MBC Dinner Series and the Treatment Access Program (TAP), a transportation assistance program that served all of Oregon and reduced the geographic barrier to care. Through the coalition, PLP heard patients express concern that they were receiving outdated information and were struggling more to find needed support and resources from their providers. Understandably, nurse navigators and social workers could not maintain and/or update patient resources while they assisted COVID patients. The goal of the coalition was to increase communication across the organizations and to share more event schedules for the ease of patients to understand what support programs are available. This session, delivered by an all breast cancer patient panel, will give an overview of Pink Lemonade Project; its programs that helps with psychological, emotional, community and financial support for breast cancer patients, survivors and those living with metastatic breast cancer; and will highlight the results from the patient point of view of the systematic review of the contents of 6 regional health systems new patient binders and present recommendations for consistent, community-wide content for all future breast cancer patients. The project’s main strength was that Pink Lemonade Project could draw upon on an existing coalition of local, community-based breast cancer organizations to help update and standardize breast cancer support information from the patient point of view. Then by acting as a neutral convener, PLP could request and receive the binders from all the region’s healthcare providers to help standardize and update the community resources across all the region’s cancer centers. The result is that any new breast cancer patient, regardless of where their access to care is, can receive consistent community-based information and resources. Another result of this project showed the importance of the partnership of healthcare and human service agencies, especially in a post-pandemic world. As the pandemic continues to strain healthcare, community-based nonprofits have a unique role to help coordinate community resources and improve the quality of life for those affected by breast cancer. Developing a Community Standard of Care for Individuals Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Across Oregon Developing a Community Standard of Care for Individuals Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Across Oregon Citation Format: Susan Stearns, Thalia Williams, Lisa Peters, Sonja Trytko. Developing a Community Standard of Care for Individuals Diagnosed with Breast Cancer Patients Across Oregon [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-59A.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».