Abstract PD13-06: PD13-06 Long-Term and Very-Long-Term Disease Control in Patients From BYLieve Study Cohort A With PIK3CA-Mutant, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: PIK3CA mutations, seen in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC), are associated with treatment (Tx) resistance and shorter survival. Alpelisib (ALP) is an α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader indicated for treating this population in combination with fulvestrant (FUL) after endocrine therapy (ET). Previous results from the SOLAR-1 study showed that progression-free survival (PFS) ≥18 mo is achievable for pts treated with ALP on/after prior Tx with aromatase inhibitor (AI). Here, we analyze pts from BYLieve study Cohort A who achieved long-term (LT) and very-long-term (VLT) disease control with ALP + FUL after prior Tx with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and AI. Methods: BYLieve was a Phase II, nonrandomized, open-label, 3-cohort study of ALP + ET in pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2– ABC whose disease progressed on/after prior CDK4/6i. In Cohort A, median (m) PFS was 7.26 mo. LT disease control was defined as ≥12 mo PFS and VLT disease control as ≥18 mo PFS. Pts with < 12 mo PFS were defined as non-LT. Baseline characteristics are summarized by duration of disease control. Incidence rate (IR) per 100 patient-treatment years (PTY) was calculated to assess exposure-adjusted adverse events (AE). To assess tumor complexity in LT/VLT pts, median circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction, chromosome (chr) 8/11 amplification, and ESR1 mutations were determined by next-generation sequencing. Results: In BYLieve Cohort A, 31 of 121 pts (25.6%) achieved LT disease control with an mPFS of 24.8 mo (95% CI 18.2 mo to not estimable [NE]) and 20 of 121 pts (16.5%) achieved VLT disease control (mPFS NE; 95% CI 22.1 mo to NE). Pts with LT/VLT disease control had lower BMI and ECOG score, longer time from initial diagnosis to first recurrence/relapse, more frequent bone-only lesions, and fewer liver metastases than non-LT pts (Table). Median ALP relative dose intensity was 86.7%, 91.7%, 85.0%, and 85.1% for all Cohort A pts (n=127), non-LT (n=96), LT (n=31), and VLT disease control (n=20), respectively, whereas median ALP exposure was 5.13 mo, 3.61 mo, 21.29 mo, and 25.25 mo respectively. The IRs per 100 PTY of diarrhea, hyperglycemia, and rash were lower in LT (IR 128.4, n=24; IR 78.0, n=20; IR 21.6, n=10 respectively) and VLT (IR 93.5, n=15; IR 51.2, n=11; IR 24.9, n=8 respectively) pts than non-LT pts (IR 250.5, n=57; IR 251.5, n=56; IR 85.4, n=30 respectively). In LT and VLT pts ctDNA fraction was 2% and 5% respectively, whereas ctDNA fraction in non-LT pts was 14%. Incidence of chr 8/11 amplification was 10% in both LT and VLT pts and 20% in non-LT pts; incidence of ESR1 mutations was 26%, 25%, and 27% in LT, VLT, and non-LT pts respectively. Conclusions: In pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2– ABC treated with ALP + FUL after CDK4/6i, LT and VLT disease control was observed in 25.6% and 16.5% of patients, respectively. Visceral disease, development of AEs, and ESR1 mutations did not preclude LT/VLT disease control. These data confirm that targeting the PIK3CA driver mutation with ALP + FUL post-CDK4/6i Tx may lead to LT disease control. Table Baseline characteristics in BYLieve Cohort A overall and by duration of disease control Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Stephen K. Chia, Javier Cortés, Giuseppe Curigliano, Patrick Neven, Rebecca Dent, Sara Tolaney, Eva Ciruelos, Yeon H. Park, Estelle Roux, Yogesh Chattar, Heather Patino, Murat Akdere, Dejan Juric. PD13-06 Long-Term and Very-Long-Term Disease Control in Patients From BYLieve Study Cohort A With PIK3CA-Mutant, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-06.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».