MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4323294052 · doi:10.1111/cobi.14080

Shifting the conservation Overton window

2023· letter· en· W4323294052 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David S. Jachowski, Robert F. Baldwin, Andy J. Boyce

Notice bibliographique

RevueConservation Biology · 2023
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConvention on Biological DiversityGovernment (linguistics)GeographyBiodiversityFlexibility (engineering)Diversity (politics)Window of opportunityEnvironmental resource managementProtected areaEnvironmental planningConventionPolitical scienceBusinessEnvironmental protectionEcologyComputer scienceBiologyEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The recent adoption of the new Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 2022) calls for the conservation of 30% of the planet by the year 2030. This goal, referred to as 30 × 30, would require nearly doubling the terrestrial area and quadrupling the marine area now considered protected. However, there is no mention in the 21 GBF targets to achieve protected areas of a certain size or level of protection, leading to concerns that practitioners might try to meet this goal by designating for inclusion areas that have little or no protection or that are small protected areas within a matrix of intensive human development—a global trend over the past 50 years (Lindsay & Malcolm, 2022). Failure to specify targets for protected area size and level of protection within the GBF and other national 30 × 30 policies is intended to allow parties flexibility in how they reach their target. For example, in the America the Beautiful Report (DOI, 2021), which outlines U.S. 30 × 30 policy, there is specific language to deemphasize large government-managed protected areas and direct funding primarily toward small-scale conservation efforts on private lands (NFWF, 2022). Although such efforts are important and practical in a world of increasing human development (Kennedy et al., 2019), we argue that establishment of large, protected areas is still possible and critically important. Past evidence suggests that without 30 × 30 policies emphasizing the need for new, large protected areas, there is likely to be an acceleration of shifting baseline syndrome, whereby tolerance for smaller and degraded protected areas will increase over time (Soga & Gaston, 2018). The Overton window concept was coined by policy analyst Joseph Overton (Lehman, 2010) to characterize the range of acceptable policies at a given time. The concept implies that introduction of ideas outside the current mainstream on a controversial topic provides political space for initiatives that are less bold to become mainstream. We propose that policy that explicitly calls for establishment of large protected areas under the 30 × 30 initiative can shift the conservation Overton window. One example of this concept in practice is the 345-km2 Katahdin Woods and Waters National (KWWN) Monument in the United States created in 2016. In the 1990s, a wealthy individual purchased land around the core area of Baxter State Park toward the goal of creating a larger Maine Woods National Park. This led to controversy with local residents and the forest industry. It also provided the opportunity for more moderate conservation groups to offer creative financial mechanisms for conservation easements on industrial land, resulting in numerous private tracts gaining conservation status (Clark & Howell, 2007). Facilitated by a concomitant decline in the forest products industry, the region shifted over 20 years to a conservation economy. These changes ultimately resulted in creation of the KWWN. Contributors to local editorial pages who opposed the original park proposal now celebrate the economic growth stimulated by the KWWN. Another example is the 1.9-million-km2 Cook Islands Marine Park (also termed Marae Moana) created in 2017. The origin can be traced to the ambitions of a former professional rugby player and Cook Islands Tourism Board member who wanted to create the world's largest marine protected area as a way to distinguish the Cook Islands from other ecotourism destinations (Durbin, 2018). Although met with initial resistance given perceived threats to local communities and fisheries, the concept gave rise to extensive stakeholder engagement and spatial planning. This resulted in the designation of multiuse zones that ultimately garnered intense public support for the marine park as a way for Cook Islanders to show "ownership" of marine resources within their exclusive economic zone (Durbin, 2018). Similar examples of creation of modern-day, large protected areas occur on every continent—from the recently created 66,000-km2 Birriliburu Indigenous Protected Area in Australia to the 4000-km2 Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique and the 2577-km2 Selvagens Islands Marine Reserve in Portugal. Examples of big ideas transforming conservation discourse also can be found in efforts to create protected corridors and networks. Ongoing efforts to establish the Brazil Marine Protected Area Network, the Yellowstone-to-Yukon Conservation Initiative in North America, SokNot landscape in Kenya and Tanzania, and Kanha Pench corridors in central India all serve as overarching large-scale initiatives that drive localized action to connect landscapes (Oppler et al., 2021). These examples show that setting large protected areas as strategic conservation targets can have significant cascading benefits by shifting the current conservation Overton window across systems, cultures, countries, and political structures with different levels of financial support. This is not a call to abandon efforts to create small protected areas. Rather, we argue that shifting of the conservation Overton window by targeting large protected areas can facilitate achieving conservation at all spatial scales by creating political space for compromise and less ambitious conservation initiatives to become mainstream. The important point is that practitioners should be thinking bigger than what might be easily achieved or deemed practical currently because that resets the conservation Overton window from which negotiations are made. However, such successes must start with a clearly articulated vision and specific policy targets for creation of large protected areas that currently do not exist.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,061
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,204

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,020
Communication savante0,0160,035
Science ouverte0,0020,016
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0610,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConservation BiologyMême sujetConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementTravaux en français237 207