What Is the Current Role of an Over-the-Scope Clip Used as First-Line Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
EditorialsApril 2023What Is the Current Role of an Over-the-Scope Clip Used as First-Line Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?Alan N. Barkun, MD, MSc and Ali A. Alali, MBBCh, BAO, MScAlan N. Barkun, MD, MScDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University and the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Ali A. Alali, MBBCh, BAO, MScDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriyah, KuwaitAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M23-0449 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail The management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) has seen substantial evolution with the emergence of novel endoscopic methods—most recently the use of cap-mounted or over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) (1).In their article, Lau and colleagues (2) completed an important trial in patients with NVUGIB, this time assessing OTSCs. Over the past 5 years, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared OTSCs with standard endoscopic hemostasis in NVUGIB, all with some methodological limitations. A small RCT of 66 patients suggested the superiority of OTSCs in patients with recurrent NVUGIB in whom initial standard endoscopic approaches failed (3). Subsequent RCTs ...References1. Bapaye J, Chandan S, Naing LY, et al. Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:712-20.e7. [PMID: 35803307] doi:10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.032 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Lau JYW, Li R, Tan C, et al. Comparison of over-the-scope clips to standard endoscopic treatment as the initial treatment in patients with bleeding from a nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal cause. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176:455-62. doi:10.7326/M22-1783 LinkGoogle Scholar3. Schmidt A, Gölder S, Goetz M, et al. Over-the-scope clips are more effective than standard endoscopic therapy for patients with recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcers. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:674-86.e6. [PMID: 29803838] doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.037 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Jensen DM, Kovacs T, Ghassemi KA, et al. Randomized controlled trial of over-the-scope clip as initial treatment of severe nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:2315-23.e2. [PMID: 32828873] doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.046 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, et al. ACG clinical guideline: upper gastrointestinal and ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:899-917. [PMID: 33929377] doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline - update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53:300-32. [PMID: 33567467] doi:10.1055/a-1369-5274 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Meier B, Wannhoff A, Denzer U, et al. Over-the-scope-clips versus standard treatment in high-risk patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial (STING-2). Gut. 2022;71:1251-8. [PMID: 35321938] doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325300 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. García-Iglesias P, Villoria A, Suarez D, et al. Meta-analysis: predictors of rebleeding after endoscopic treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:888-900. [PMID: 21899582] doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04830.x CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Chan S, Pittayanon R, Wang HP, et al. Use of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus standard therapy for the prevention of rebleeding in large peptic ulcers (size ≥1.5 cm): an open-labelled, multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2022. [PMID: 36307177] doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Hollenbach M, Decker A, Schmidt A, et al. A comparison between traumatic and atraumatic over-the-scope-clips in patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding: a retrospective analysis with propensity-score-based matching. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023. [PMID: 36738794] doi:10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.051 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Alan N. Barkun, MD, MSc; Ali A. Alali, MBBCh, BAO, MScAffiliations: Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University and the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriyah, KuwaitDisclosures: Authors have reported no disclosures of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-0449.Corresponding Author: Alan N. Barkun, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Room D7-346, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; e-mail, Alan.Barkun.[email protected]gouv.qc.ca.This article was published at Annals.org on 7 March 2023. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoComparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment as the Initial Treatment in Patients With Bleeding From a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause James Y.W. Lau , Rui Li , Chen-huan Tan , Xiu-jing Sun , Hao-jun Song , Lan Li , Feng Ji , Bu-jiang Wang , Dong-tao Shi , Wai K. Leung , Imogen Hartley , Alan Moss , Karina Y.Y. Yu , Bing Y. Suen , Peng Li , and Francis K.L. Chan Metrics Current IssueApril 2023Volume 176, Issue 4Page: 576-577KeywordsClinical trialsEsophagogastroduodenoscopyHemostatics ePublished: 7 March 2023 Issue Published: April 2023 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2023 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».