A219 BIOLOGIC USE DURING PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND ASSOCIATED NEONATAL OUTCOMES: A RETROSPECTIVE CHART REVIEW
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Biologics are the mainstay of therapy for patients with advanced inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Most biologics readily undergo placental transfer during the second trimester and remain detectable in infant serum for up to 12 months. Therefore, most clinical guidelines currently recommend avoiding live vaccines in the first 6 to 12 months for exposed infants. In Canada, the rotavirus vaccine is the only live vaccine administered before 6 months. Emerging evidence is suggesting that the vaccine may safely be given to infants with normal immune function, even if serum biologic level is detectable. Specialist assessment of infant immune function may help guide decision-making about rotavirus vaccine administration, but there remains a large gap in our knowledge of the impact of biologic exposure on the immune function of infants, necessitating further study. Purpose In this single-centre retrospective chart review, we aim to study the clinical outcomes, immune function, and rotavirus vaccine recommendations for infants exposed to biologics in utero during their first year of life. Method The study included mothers seen at the Pregnancy IBD Clinic at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, ON, who were offered a referral to the Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) at The Hospital for Sick Children due to biologic exposure in utero. Data was collected on the recommendations made by paediatric specialists at SIC, based on complete blood count, lymphocyte phenotyping, and T-cell receptor excision analysis. Data was obtained on adverse neonatal outcomes in the first year of life, including prematurity, congenital malformations, and infections based on post-partum surveys completed by mothers and follow-up letters from SIC. Result(s) 43 patients were referred to and seen by paediatric specialists at SIC between 2 to 12 months of age. 18 infants (42%) were exposed to Adalimumab in utero, 16 (37%) to Infliximab, 5 (12%) to Vedolizumab, and 4 (9%) to Ustekinumab. The rotavirus vaccine was recommended to 34 infants (81%) and not recommended to 3 (7%) for reasons including gastrointestinal illness, neutropenia, and low lymphocyte counts. Recommendation is pending for 6 infants (14%). Two infants (5%) had premature births. Four infants (9%) were admitted to the NICU for reasons including respiratory distress, and prematurity (9%). One infant (2%) had a congenital malformation, specifically bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Six infants (14%) had upper respiratory tract infections, none of which required hospital admission or antibiotics. Conclusion(s) This study is currently in progress. Further data is required to assess whether biologic exposure in utero has a significant impact on neonatal immune function, especially beyond the first year of life, and whether there is a significant difference in vaccine recommendations and response based on the type of biologic received. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».