A203 EARLY PROACTIVE DRUG MONITORING STRATEGY OF INFLIXIMAB AS MONOTHERAPY FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS IS ASSOCIATED WITH GOOD SUSTAINED CLINICAL REMISSION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Monotherapy with Infliximab (IFX) can be as efficient as combotherapy with immunomodulators in the treatment and maintenance of remission for children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) if an early proactive therapeutic drug monitoring strategy is adequately performed. This strategy may allow optimization of blood levels of IFX in order to obtain a sustained clinical response. Purpose This study demonstrated that with appropriate early trough levels of IFX before dose #3 and dose #4 , monotherapy was very efficient in inducing remssion at week 52 . Method A retrospective study was conducted at CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal,Canada .Children with IBD 2 to 18 years old diagnosed between 01/2018 and 06/2020 and treated with IFX less than 30 days after diagnosis were included .IFX blood levels were collected before the 3rd and/or 4th dose of IFX and regularly thereafter. Adjustments were done in IFX dose per infusion according to blood levels and clinical response. The primary outcome was clinical remission at one year after diagnosis.The secondary outcomes included: (1) At 52 weeks, the median (IQR) dose of IFX (mg/kg) and the intervals between IFX infusions ; (2) the median (IQR) number of IFX dose changes and the median (IQR) number of blood trough levels of IFX done. Result(s) 101 patients were included : 56.4% males; 81CD; 18 UC; 2 IBDU. Mean age at diagnosis was 13.2 years (IQR = 11.20 to 15. 20). Median time to IFX initiation after diagnosis was 5 days (IQR :3-14).Median IFX dose #1: was 8.4 mg/kg (IQR = 5. 8 to 10). 90% of patient had an IFX optimisation (increasing dose and/or shortening intervals) after dose 3 or dose 4. At week 52, 36,5% of patients were receiving IFX infusion every 4 weeks and 30,6% every 6 weeks. The median IFX dose per infusion was 8,9mg/kg (IQR = 7.4- 9,8 ). The IFX doses at week 52 varied greatly according to age at diagnosis The median number of IFX blood level dosage was 4 per patient over a year (IQR=3-5).At week 52, 83 patients (84.6%) achieved clinical remission with a median IFX level of 10.96 (7.05-15.59). 74 /83 (89%) were on monotherapy and 9/83(10.8%) on combotherapy Image Conclusion(s) Early treatment for IBD with IFX as monotherapy and an early proactive optimization strategy is associated with a good sustained steroid free clinical remissionAt week 52, 83 patients (84.6%) achieved clinical remission with a median IFX level of 10.96 (7.05-15.59). 74 /83 (89%) were on monotherapy and 9/83(10.8%) on combotherapy.The majority of the patients required IFX optimization during their first year of treatment. We therefore recommend to proactively monitor blood levels of IFX before the third and fourth dose of IFX and thereafter, in order to lower the risk of treatment failure and anti-infliximab antibodies occurrence. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest C. Girard: None Declared, S. Ackhar: None Declared, S. Sassine: None Declared, L. Chapuy: None Declared, P. Jantchou: None Declared, C. Deslandres Speakers bureau of: moderator and speaker Abbvie and Janssen
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».