A6 PROTEASE-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR (PAR)-2 ACTIVATION ENHANCES EPITHELIAL WOUND HEALING MIGRATION THROUGH SRC AND RAC1 PATHWAYS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Protease-activated receptors (PARs) and their activating enzymes have been postulated to play a role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis, but the specific roles of PAR2 in disease initiation and progression remain unclear. PAR2 activation has both pro-proliferative and pro-migratory effects and could be involved with the restoration of the epithelial barrier following injury. We previously showed that PAR2 activation increases epithelial wound healing through ERK, PI3K, and JNK pathways. However, the role of Src kinase and RhoGTPases, which PAR2 also activates, is not known. Purpose We hypothesized that PAR-2 activation induces wound healing in intestinal epithelial cells through Src and Rac1 activity. Method Circular wounds were made in T84 colonic epithelial cell monolayers. Wounded monolayers were treated with the PAR2 activating peptide, 2-furoyl-LIGRLO (2fLI, 5 μM), or the inactive control reverse-sequence peptide, 2-furoyl-OLRGIL (2fO, 5 μM), and live-cell imaging was used to record wound healing over a 24-hr period. Proliferation and apoptosis were measured using EdU and TUNEL assays, respectively. The mechanism of action was evaluated using inhibitors of Src (PP2), EGFR (PD153035), MLCK (ML-7), ROCK (Y-27632), Rac1 (NSC 23766), and Cdc42 (ML141), and western blot (WB) was used to confirm the protein levels of p-Src (Y416), p-ERK1/2, p-JNK, and p-PI3K. For immunofluorescence, images of E-cadherin and F-actin were taken to capture the entire wound border and surrounding cells. Result(s) PAR2 activation by 2fLI promoted wound healing compared to 2fO or vehicle control at the 24-hr time point (p<0.05). PAR2 activation had no effect on proliferation at the wound edge and did not affect apoptosis but did enhance lamellipodia/filopodia formation (p<0.001). These findings indicate that PAR2 reprograms the cells toward a migratory rather than a proliferative phenotype. When we investigated the mechanisms of action, the Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PP2, blocked PAR2-induced wound healing (p<0.0001). PAR2 activation increased Src phosphorylation (Y416, p<0.05) and the immunofluorescence showed a rise in actin cable formation at the wound edge and a reduction in lamellipodia/filopodia formation in the group treated with PP2 when compared to 2fLI (p<0.001). Although PAR2 activation increases the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and JNK, this did not happen through Src. Furthermore, PAR2 did not increase the phosphorylation of PI3K as confirmed by WB analysis. Inhibition of EGFR (PD153035), MLCK (ML-7), ROCK (Y-27632), and Cdc42 (ML-141) did not alter PAR2-induced wound healing (p>0.05). In contrast, Rac1 inhibition by NSC23766 completely abrogated the PAR2-induced wound healing (p<0.05). Conclusion(s) PAR2 activation drives wound healing via Src tyrosine kinase and Rac1 activities. These findings provide a further mechanism whereby PAR2 can participate in the resolution of intestinal wounds in gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».