A99 EFFICACY OF THE IN-HOSPITAL OBSERVATORY PERIOD FOR IBD PATIENTS WITH FLARE TREATED WITH ORAL CORTICOSTEROIDS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic, debilitating collection of diseases with significant impairment to patient quality of life and hospital burden. Patients with acute flare of their disease are managed with IV corticosteroids and ultimately transitioned to an oral equivalent. Despite no formal guideline recommendation, some patients remain in hospital on oral corticosteroids, primarily for observation. Given that each day spent in hospital carries significant costs, examining this observatory period is warranted. The utility of the observatory period for patients recently switched to oral corticosteroids has not yet been studied and may be unnecessarily increasing hospital stays and costs to the Canadian medical system. Purpose - Analyse the efficacy of the in-hospital period for patients on oral corticosteroids after an acute IBD flare in preventing recurrence in the 14 and 28 days post discharge. - Assess the relationship between length of the in-hospital “observatory” period with future hospital burden. Method - This retrospective cohort study identified patients with known IBD who were admitted to Royal Columbian Hospital under the Gastroenterology service primarily for acute flare of their disease from June 1, 2020 to June 30th, 2022. Patients were identified through the clinic EMR (Plexia) and hospital information was accessed via the Fraser Health Health Records Department. This study acheived ethics approval by the Fraser Health Research Ethics Board (Event: 2022376). - Inclusion criteria are as follows: - Age > 18 years old - Prior diagnosis of IBD as per CAG guidelines - Acute IBD flare is primary reason for hospitalization - Hospital management includes IV corticosteroids and discharge medications include a tapering course of oral corticosteroid. - Exclusion criteria are as follows: - Patients found to be non-compliant on outpatient medication regimen (i.e tapering dose of PO prednisone). - Patients with a complicated course in management (concurrent illness that impacted hospital stay). Result(s) -20 patients were identified, with 60 total hospital admissions. -35 visits included an observatory period, with 6 less than 24hr (1 hospital re-presentation), and 29 greater than 24hr (3 hospital re-presentations). -25 visits did not have an observatory period. -The relative risk of patients without an observatory period returning to hospital within 14 and 28 days compared to those with an observatory period was 4.2 and 1.75, respectively. Conclusion(s) These preliminary results suggest an increased relative risk for those without an in-hospital observatory period for short term re-hospitalization. However, we hypothesize this will significantly change once we have broadened our date range and increased our total number of hospitalizations, which is planned prior to the poster presentation date. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».