A101 VIRTUAL MINDFULNESS-BASED STRESS REDUCTION FOR ADULTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: FEASIBILITY TRIAL PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) often suffer from high levels of anxiety and depression. Despite high rates of mental health comorbidity, a low proportion of patients receive psychiatric referrals and treatment. In Canada, provincial health care plans cover psychiatric services, making them affordable for patients and making referral efficient for gastroenterologists. Psychiatrist-led virtually-delivered Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has been associated with reducing feelings of stress, anxiety, and depression in several high-quality randomized control trials. It also reduces cost and travel requirements for patients, both which have been identified as barriers to accessing mental health treatment. Purpose To assess the feasibility of online-delivered MBSR for IBD patients, with feasibility outcomes defined as recruitment success, and attendance, adherence, and attrition of participating patients. Method Eligible participants were adult IBD patients aged 18-65 attending gastroenterology clinics in Edmonton, Alberta who self-identified as being anxious or depressed and/or were referred by their gastroenterologist. A research coordinator contacted eligible patients who expressed interest in participating after completing an assessment of symptoms and a semi-structured interview with a psychiatrist. The MBSR protocol was an 8-week group-based intervention aimed at giving participants tools to cope with stress effectively. Participants attended 8 weekly sessions lasting 2.5 hours/week and a one-time weekend session lasting 5 hours. They were also asked to practice every night for 45-60 minutes. Completion of the program required attendance of at least 6 of 8 weekly sessions and the weekend session. Two groups, led by the same team of qualified psychiatrists, started MBSR, with sessions occurring in the evening via Zoom. Result(s) Of the 64 patients referred to the study, 16 (25%) agreed to participate. Reasons for declining to participate are shown in Table 1, with 80% indicating they were too busy. Of the 16 patients enrolled, the median age was 36 (range: 18-55), 10 identified as female (62.5%) and 8 had Crohn’s Disease (50%). Attendance, adherence, and attrition data from the first group of 7 participants were recorded. Only 3 (42.8%) successfully completed the program. The participants that completed the program had an attendance rate of 100% and practiced 6 nights a week for an average of 25 minutes a night. A second group with 9 participants is currently ongoing. Image Conclusion(s) Although interest in a cost-free, virtual stress management resource was relatively high, willingness to enroll in MBSR specifically, was low, largely due to the time commitment. Follow-up interviews with those who enrolled and did not enroll in the intervention are underway to highlight the benefits and barriers to MBSR. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».