A237 STATIN USE IN LIVER TRANSPLANT: INDICATION, USE, AND IMPACT OF STATIN THERAPY ON PATIENT OUTCOMES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases are prevalent among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and contribute to adverse outcomes and mortality. Prior studies have hypothesized statin therapy improves liver transplant (LT) survival due to anti-inflammatory properties and reduced cardiac risk. Evidence for use of statins in this population is limited as acute liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis is considered a contraindication. Despite evidence supporting statin therapy in CLD their use remains inconsistent. Purpose Our study aimed to evaluate the indication and rate of statin use in patients both pre- and post-LT, as well as the impact on post-LT patient survival, graft failure, and post-LT cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Method This was a retrospective cohort study of adult LT recipients at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada between 2005 and 2020. Exclusion criteria included pre-transplant acute liver failure, multi-visceral transplant, and re-transplant. Demographic, pharmaceutical and clinical data was collected through review of electronic medical records. Primary endpoints included rate of statin use, post-LT patient survival, and graft failure; secondary endpoints included development of cardiac disease, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome post-LT. Result(s) We identified 868 patients meeting inclusion criteria; 596 (68.7%) were male, 713 (82.3%) were Caucasian, and median age at transplant was 55. The most common indication for LT was hepatocellular carcinoma in 291 patients (33.5%), followed by Hepatitis C Virus (24.0%), and alcohol liver disease (16.9%). There were no significant demographic differences between those who were and were not on statin therapy. In the pre-LT period only 3% of patients were on statins, despite 7% of patients having dyslipidemia and 24% having diabetes. A total of 261 patients (29.9%) were placed on statins post-LT. The use of statins post-LT was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.433, 95% CI [0.302-0.622], p<0.001) and decreased graft failure (OR 0.398, 95% CI [0.276-0.574], p<0.001), however it was also associated with increased graft rejection (OR 1.40, 95% CI [1.02-1.93], p=0.039). There were no significant differences in the development of dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome or cardiac events in post-LT patients regardless of statin use. Conclusion(s) In our study we identified an association between statin use in the post-LT setting and improved mortality and graft survival. We did not find an association with improved cardiac or metabolic outcomes. The negative association between statin use and post-LT rejection may reflect detection bias as patients with rejection are closely monitored. We also identified a discrepancy between the number of patients with indication for statin use and those who were on statins both pre and post LT, reflecting underutilization consistent with prior literature. Additional studies are required to elucidate the role of statin medications in the transplant hepatologists armamentarium. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».