A109 TRANEXAMIC ACID TO PREVENT BLEEDING AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A PILOT PROJECT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Colonoscopy and polypectomy reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, but is also associated with adverse events, including bleeding. Postpolypectomy delayed bleeding (PPDB) after EMR of large colorectal polyps (≥2cm) has an incidence of 2.6-9.7%. Tranexamic acid is a member of a class of drugs called antifibrinolytic agents. It reduces fibrinolysis by slowing down the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, which may prevent bleeding. Purpose The goal of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of using tranexamic acid after EMR of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) to prevent PPDB. Method This was a single center feasibility study conducted at the Kingston Health Sciences Center from March 2021 to September 2021. Patients referred for removal of a ≥2cm LNPCP and those who were referred for a positive fecal immunochemical test were approached for consideration of inclusion. Patients with INR ≥ 1.5, platelets <50, higher risk of risk of thromboembolic events (atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation, history of stroke, TIA, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis hypercoagulable state, mechanical heart valve on anticoagulation, myocardial infarction in the last twelve months), pregnancy or undergoing ESD were not included. Coagulation of submucosal vessels after polypectomy by snare tip coagulation or forceps was performed if thought necessary by the endoscopist. Clipping could be performed only where there was concern for perforation. Intraprocedural bleeding was recorded and managed at the discretion of the endoscopist. After the procedure was completed, 1 gram of TXA in 100mL of normal saline (NS) was infused over a 10-minute interval. The participants received tranexamic acid 1 gram PO TID to be taken for 5 days after the procedure. A post procedure day 5, 14 and 30 phone call was conducted with participants to monitor study drug compliance and adverse events. Result(s) A total of 25 patients were enrolled with a mean polyp size of 3 cm. Baseline patient and polyp characteristics are presented in table 1. 90% of eligible patients approached consented to be in the study. Procedure details are presented in table 2. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 7 patients (28%) and all of these were treated with soft coagulation. 2 patients had clipping for muscle injury. All 25 patients received IV TXA post procedure. 16 patients (64%) took every dose of the prescribed pills. 21 patients (84%) took at least 80% of the prescribed TXA pills. 1 patient presented with post polypectomy bleeding. All patients completed the day 30 follow up phone call. There were no adverse events. Image Conclusion(s) TXA to prevent postpolypectomy delayed bleeding (PPDB) was feasible to use with no adverse events reported. All patients received IV TXA post procedure and completed 30 day follow up. However, only 64% of patients took every scheduled dose of medication. A randomized controlled study will be needed to see if TXA can significantly reduce PPDB. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; Queen's University DOM Research Award – Clinical Innovation Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».