A87 PERSPECTIVES ON DIET MODIFICATION TO MANAGE THEIR SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. A SCOPING REVIEW
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The link between diet, disease activity and symptoms in IBD patients have recently gained attention and recommendations on dietary interventions to manage symptoms are common. Most studies have explored the correlation between dietary patterns and increased risk of IBD or symptom severity. However, there is limited understanding and no relevant systematic review of IBD patients’ perspectives and barriers to adopt the prescribed diets. We thus conducted a scoping review for this topic. Purpose Aim: We performed a scoping review of current evidence to investigate the extent of evidence on IBD adult patients’ perspectives on dietary modification to manage their symptoms and gaps for future research to explore patients' experiences. Method We followed the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) method for scoping reviews. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted in April 2022 to retrieve published English language qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies that report IBD patients’ perspectives, behaviours, beliefs related to diet modification and barriers to diet adoption for managing their symptoms or disease activity. We manually reviewed reference lists of reviews on this topic. Since this is a scoping review, no statistical comparison is needed. Result(s) Out of 2822 papers screened, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Various methods were used in included studies with heterogenous outcomes reported. Of the 42 studies, 19 reported IBD patients' beliefs and behaviors related to diet as a primary outcome. Most patients reported changing their diet after being diagnosed with IBD, and food avoidance and restrictive diet were commonly reported to prevent relapse. Some studies reported that many patients reduced their opportunities for social life, such as eating out, practicing outdoor sports, having dinner with family in the same household and meeting friends. The dietary modification was more significant among individuals with active than inactive disease. Most studies showed that patients believe food can play a role in causing or preventing relapse, but beliefs are varied regarding the role of diet as initiating factor for IBD. Some patients believe dietary modification could be more important than medication to manage their disease symptoms. Few studies focused on patients' barriers when changing their diet, but financial barriers and limited nutritional guidance were commonly reported acknowledging searching for dietary advice on the internet. Conclusion(s) Food avoidance and social restriction for relapse prevention are standard practices by most IBD patients. The belief that nutrition is key in managing IBD is prevalent. This scoping review highlights the need to identify patients' barriers to accessing professional dietary guidance and nutritional interventions and provides direction for clinical studies and systematic reviews of focused research questions. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,071 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,023 | 0,020 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».