Use of Fantasy Points in Evaluating Professional Athlete Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our aim in performing this study was to evaluate whether fantasy and wins above replacement (WAR) scores of athletes undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery in the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey League (NHL), and Major League Baseball (MLB) could be utilized in evaluating their performance post-surgery. We identified publicly accessible data on professional athletes from 1992 to 2015. Fantasy and WAR scores were calculated for each player. A total of 83 professional players met the inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study. Decreased fantasy scores ranged from 33% to 42% across the four leagues after the index operation. NHL players had the lowest return-to-play (RTP) rate at 11/17 (82%), and MLB players had the highest RTP rate at 14/15 (93%). RTP rates of NBA and NFL players were comparable at 22/26 (85%) and 22/25 (88%), respectively. NFL players had the lowest average career length after surgery at 26 months, while NBA players had the longest average career length at 64 months. MLB players on average required the longest time to return to the pre-surgical level of performance (21 months). NHL players had the shortest average recovery time (eight months), and NBA players had the longest average recovery time (13 months). Approximately, more than half of all the studied players exhibited a decline in fantasy or WAR scores. In addition, NFL players had the lowest average career length, and NBA players enjoyed the longest average career length after surgery. NHL players had the lowest recovery time, while NBA players had the longest recovery time. The strength of this study is the utilization of fantasy points and WAR scores as a single unifying measure of a player's performance, which acts as an objective measure after ACL reconstruction. The average performance of a professional athlete, as evaluated through their fantasy score output, tends to decrease after undergoing ACL reconstruction. There is an overall long-term performance decline after initial spikes in their performance after surgery. Additional larger studies are needed to fully understand the effects of ACL reconstruction in professional athletes; however, the use of fantasy scores may be an objective tool in measuring the success rate of ACL reconstruction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».