An Analytics Based Approach to Improving Digital Learning Efficacy in the Energy Sector
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The supply of skills to fill modern job requirements in the energy sector has been overextended by the pace of advancing technology and increasing attrition. Underpinning this problem is the inadequate availability of effective training. This learning gap results primarily from four factors: Scarcity of qualified expertise, budget constraints, time requirements and curriculum relevance. Properly deployed online learning addresses these factors, but has so far not been widely adopted in the energy sector. It is hypothesized the adoption rate could be increased by focusing on what drives lesson completion velocity, or the pace at which a student completes their coursework. By encouraging learning methods that create positive momentum, they are more likely to have sustained engagement and complete their course. In this study of over 1600 students, multiple online-learning methods were tested to determine which method results in the highest lesson completion velocities. Three different learning methods were evaluated against completion velocity. These methods include: Unstructured, Cohorts and Enrolments. The Unstructured group were provided with access to digital courses without any program to follow. ‘Enrolments’ represents a single learner who has given him/herself specific time-bound learning goals. And ‘Cohorts’ is similar to Enrolments but where a group of learners are assigned to the same learning schedule and have visibility into each other's learning progress. Students have the option of learning in any one, or a combination of these formats. Two years of online learner data was reviewed. Other variables included within the analysis included the learner's job title, course and organization. The data was analyzed to determine what drives learner engagement. A Shapiro-Wilk test indicated the data was highly non-normal, which meant parametric approaches were not appropriate to use. It was found that the ‘Cohort’ method was most correlated to higher lesson completion velocity. When learners were part of a Cohort, the student completed an extra course day per month in comparison to the Unstructured approach (the baseline), representing an 82% increase. Within the confidence interval of the data, ‘Enrolment’ was not observed to increase the number of lessons completed. However, Enrolment did affect the completion velocity. Job title and organization was also found to influence completion velocity. Continuing education requires significant improvement to address the widening skills gap in the industry. While digital learning technology will undoubtedly play a strong role in fulfilling future training requirements, it is important to understand what drives learner engagement. To the knowledge of the authors, no study of this scale has been previously performed in the oil and gas digital learning space. The results of this study could be used to help design new, or improve existing online training programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».