Blazing the Trail and Setting the Pace: Central Neighborhood House and its Outreach to Italian Immigrants in Toronto: 1911-1929
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The importance of immigrants in the outreach programmes of North American settlements 1s well known.The activities of Hull House in Chicago or of the Henry Street Settlement in New York have been described and their immigrant programmes detailed in contemporary and historical studies."Less known, however, is the response of the immigrants themselves to the settlements' outreach in the pre-World War II period.This paper will address this issue in an examination of Toronto's Central Neighborhood House (CNH), a non-denominational settlement located in the core of the city's "foreign quarter", the downtown "Ward".The House was among the first Canadian social settlements established and the first organized explicitly for the use and "uplift" of non-English speaking immigrants.Two broad questions will be treated in turn:(1) What function did CNH serve in the Ward?What were its aims and objectives with special reference to the Italian immigrants of the district?(11) What did the immigrants themselves make of the settlement?How did the Italian first generation, and the Italian young in particular, respond?To what extent did the settlement actually succeed in its "outreach" programme as outlined in its aims and objectives?Beginning in the summer of 1909 and concluding the following summer, an extensive survey of the spiritual, social and economic conditions of the Ward was conducted by students of Victoria College at the University of Toronto.Anticipating the results of the more famous Hastings Report of 1911, the survey statistically reaffirmed the already well known picture of the 1911, Kelso, Bryce and Burnett in association with members of the Toronto Playgrounds Association, the National Council of Women, concerned philanthropic businessmen and a Jewish and Catholic representative gathered formally in Toronto's City Hall to draw up a statement of intent and to chart the future course of the fledgling settlement.As a point of priority, the non-denominational character of the settlement was very early affirmed.The new institution, Kelso explained, was neither a mission nor a charity; rather --in a concerted effort to distance the settlement from the variety of proselytizing agencies in the district--he stressed that workers "emphasize matters of common agreement instead of making prominent the points of greatest difference."*Agreed as to what the settlement was not, the organizers proceeded to define what it was.Organized as a community social centre, Central Neighborhood House was to serve --first and foremost--as a "neighborhood force" where, in Kelso's words, "the varying social needs of all are catered to in a spirit of comradeship and goodwill and with an entire absence of the charity and patronizing spirit."Much like Hull House, on which it was modelled, the settlement was to be a "democratic meeting-place", a place where "[p]eople of all races, creeds and stages of culture could get together and come to a better understanding [of each other]."°Underlying these sentiments was the expressed belief in the "oneness" or "kinship of humanity"; as Alice Chown, an early exponent of social settlements and CNH resident explained, "the essential likeness
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».