Age affects the relationships between kinematics and postural stability during gait
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Past work has identified relationships between postural stability and joint kinematics during balance and sit-to-stand tasks. However, this work has not been extended to a thorough examination of these relationships during gait, and how these relationships change with age. An improved understanding of age-related changes in these relationships during gait is necessary to identify early predictors of gait impairments and implement targeted interventions to prevent functional decline in older adulthood. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does age affect relationships between time-varying signals representing joint/segment kinematics and postural stability during gait? METHODS: Three-dimensional, whole-body motion capture data from 48 participants (19 younger, 29 older) performing overground gait were used in this secondary analysis. Lower extremity joint angles, trunk segment angles, and margins of stability in the antero-posterior and mediolateral directions were subsequently derived. Pairings of angle and margin of stability signals were cross-correlated across the gait cycle. Metrics representing the strength of relationships were extracted from the cross-correlation functions and compared between groups. RESULTS: At the ankle, significant age-related differences were only identified in the mediolateral direction, with older adults' coefficients being of greater magnitude and more tightly clustered, relative to younger adults. Differences were observed in both directions at the hip, with an overall trend of greater-magnitude and more tightly clustered coefficients among younger adults. For the trunk, the groups exhibited coefficients of opposite signs in the antero-posterior direction. SIGNIFICANCE: While overall gait performance was similar between groups, age-related differences were identified in relationships between postural stability and kinematics, with stronger relationships at the hip and ankle for younger and older adults, respectively. Relationships between postural stability and kinematics may have potential as a marker for the early identification of gait impairment and/or dysfunction in older adulthood, and for quantifying the effectiveness of interventions to reduce gait impairment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».