Physical and Numerical Simulations of Offset Well Pair Combined Steam Drive and Gravity Drainage Process to Develop Super-Heavy Oil or Oil Sands Project
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) using parallel dual-horizontal wells made great success in developing heavy oil or oil sands projects. However, the performance may be greatly impaired when shale laminae with high frequency exist. In order to enhance oil production and decrease steam to oil ratio (SOR), this paper conducts feasibility study of offset well pair using steam drive and gravity drainage to develop oil sands project by overcoming shale laminae. Physical simulations of offset well pairs under three horizontal distance were first carried out to analyze the mechanism. On the basis, homogeneous model and heterogeneous model incorporating staggered shale laminae were constructed, respectively. Then numerical simulations of conventional SAGD well pair and offset well pair using steam drive and gravity drainage were conducted to evaluate the influence of pay thickness and possibility of mitigating adverse impact of shale laminae. Moreover, several configurations of offset well pairs and their application results were proposed. The results of physical simulations indicate that there is larger lateral steam chamber development compared with conventional well pair. While for numerical simulations, for homogeneous case, compared with conventional well pair, offset well pair achieves similar performance but delaying oil production for 0.5 year, and the performance cannot be improved significantly even if aggressive pressure difference or subcool control is enforced. But for heterogeneous model with existing inter-well shale laminae, offset well pair can significantly improve early to mid-term performance and accelerate early steam chamber growth by enforcing pressure difference. But once steam chamber has grown to a certain height, there is no big difference between offset and conventional well pairs. Furthermore, three configurations of offset well pairs are evaluated including the injector drilled 3 m high and 4 m laterally from the producer, offset horizontal injector and multilateral producer, and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing or dilation assisted enlarge well spacing of 10-30m. Encouragingly, offset horizontal injector and multilateral producer has made great success by a combination of steam drive and gravity drainage in Canadian Surmont oil sands project. The proposed technology was first studied by combined physical and numerical simulations, and it can be effectively applied to relatively low quality oil sands projects such as thin pay and challenging pay with staggered shale laminae. Several configurations of offset well pairs have been listed as pilot suggestions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».