MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4324130869 · doi:10.5539/hes.v13n2p14

Guidelines for the Development of Thai Reading and Writing under the COVID19 Situation of Grade 1 Students at Huai Ton Na Fai Educational Quality Development Center

2023· article· en· W4324130869 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Piyaporn Seesun, Ninmani Tharintharawat, Teerasit Sawat, Boonchom Srisa-ard, Songsak Phusee-orn, Yannapat Seehamongkol, Apantee Poonputra

Notice bibliographique

RevueHigher Education Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMahasarakham University
Mots-clésReading (process)PsychologyQuality (philosophy)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medical educationMathematics educationQuality standardPedagogyMedicinePolitical scienceChemistryPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This research aimed to 1) study current conditions and problems in the development of reading and writing Thai language under the situation of COVID-19 of Grade 1 students at Huai Ton Na Fai Educational Quality Development Center; and 2) study the guidelines for the development of Thai reading and writing under the situation of COVID-19 of Grade 1 students at Huai Ton Na Fai Educational Quality Development Center. This mixed method research was divided into 2 phases: Phase 1: studied current conditions and problems from the sample group consisted of 138 participants from 8 schools; and Phase 2 studied the guidelines for the development from 12 experts through a focus group discussion. Research tools used in the research were an interview form and a questionnaire with 0.977 of reliability. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis. The results on the study of the current conditions and problems on Thai reading and writing revealed that the policy in practicing reading and writing skills and the selection of the 5 “On”s (On Site, On Air, Online, On Demand, and On Hand) were operated the highest which was accounted for 100%. On the other hand, the lowest current operating conditions were the readiness of learning management of parents and the creation of a conducive atmosphere for students to concentrate on their studies which were accounted for 89.90%. In addition, the study also showed that, in general, the average mean score and standard deviation of the development problem are 3.07 and 1.21, respectively. For the development guidelines, the recommendations are as follows. 1) In term of the on-site learning’s concept, method, and process, it is suggested that the students should be divided into a small group to reduce a class size. Further, an MOU with parents should be made and equipment and safety management policies should be established using the agency's budget. 2) Owing to the on-hand learning development guidelines, the study suggests that teachers should explain clearly about the worksheets to parents, choose an appropriate learning style and minimize home visits for a safety reason, and study to find methods and approaches that are appropriate for the situation. In addition, parents should record videos of reading and writing and send to teachers. Finally, the professional development of teachers should be promoted. 3) In order to promote the Thai reading and writing competence and skills, a time should be allocated for students to meet with teachers and classmates to reduce stress, the learning media and technology should be provided, the authentic measurement and assessment should be applied with the necessary indicators, the reading habit should be built, and a reading and writing competition should be organized. 4) A reading habits project, a delivery project, and a learning innovation project should be organized to develop the Thai reading and writing skills.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,326
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,349
Tête enseignante GPT0,548
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHigher Education StudiesMême sujetTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesTravaux en français237 207