The Broken Years: Russia’s Disabled War Veterans, 1904–1921 by AlexandreSumpf. Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 322 pp. $99.99. ISBN 978‐1‐0090‐4729‐6
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Alexandre Sumpf's outstanding study of disabled veterans in the Russian Empire across three early twentieth century wars offers a fresh look at the soldier in Russian and Soviet history.While the topic in broad strokes has been done before, including draconian Tsarist conscription laws in the nineteenth century and the social, cultural, military, and everyday life histories of the Red Army in the Soviet era, veterans of the Russo-Japanese War, the First World War, and the Russian Civil War have not drawn nearly as much attention from historians.Sumpf's decision to recover these particular veterans' stories is significant, but his achievement goes much further.Drawing on an astonishing depth of sources in three languages, Sumpf's straightforward but powerful argument seems obvious only in hindsight and thanks to his meticulous research: that the plight of Russia's disabled veterans is only fully knowable within this longue durée of "interlocking wars" (p.12).He shows, for example, how the 1904-5 war provided the Russian medical and legal systems early experience with the effects of mechanized warfare that European governments did not share in 1914, and how the Bolshevik elevation of the Red Army soldier closed services for veterans of earlier wars.The book above all is a major contribution to disability history for Russia and the USSR, a still-understudied field (with notable exceptions by Maria Cristina Galmarini-Kabala, Beate Fieseler, and Claire Shaw, all of whom Sumpf references).Sumpf develops his argument over six chapters that proceed mostly chronologically, although he wisely gives each a thematic focus as well.In chapter 1 he navigates unreliable data on casualties and shifting definitions of incapacitation to define "disabled war veterans as a social group" (p.18).This chapter also includes a fascinating section on soldiers suspected by medical professionals of wounding themselves.Although not a sizeable group, these veterans aided popular suspicion of all disabled servicemen.In chapter 2, Sumpf focuses on the increasing medicalization of veterans' care, especially during the First World War.Making "soldiers into patients" was also about demonstrating the reach of public health care and the government's ability to care for the "national body" as an extension of the soldier's body (p.56).Like in Europe, Russia's public health discourse emerged during, and because of, the huge numbers of wounded returning from the Great War.But as Sumpf points out, the Russians drew on their experience in the war with Japan in developing treatments.He also shows that the Tsarist medical establishment prioritized restoring disabled veterans' labor functionality, from managing pain to fitting men with prosthetic limbs.The Great War set Russian health care on a democratic path, with veterans pioneering better access to care for all.Chapter 3 discusses laws governing disability status and pensions.Sumpf focuses on a 1912 law on pension rights, one of the remarkable social service achievements of the Russo-Japanese War, not the Great War as we might assume.These legal frameworks helped change how all disabled people 544
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».