Editorial: Thinking about bodies in societies. Theories, phenomena and relevance for education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
been directly or indirectly communicated to members of each society how to deal with their body, how to perceive and judge it, and how to modify it. Psychology provides some helpful terms and dimensions that can be used to map society's influence. There are conceptualizations that make certain body-related phenomena accessible. Whatever the influences on the body are, we consider this topic to be a central theme of the human sciences and thus, of psychology. If we understand more about these social influences, we could potentially have a positive impact in our circles of influence as well.Specifically, with this Research Topic we aimed to collect knowledge and expertise to understand these influences on the body and to collect ideas about how to give young people control over their bodies and their body image. Four research papers on this complex topic have now been published in this Research Topic. Of course, this can only provide a very fragmentary answer to the questions that concern us. But that is the nature of empirical research: we collect many small pieces of the puzzle so that a larger picture can emerge through theoretical networking, closer observation, more realitycongruent hypothesis generation, and a more sophisticated empirical approach. But as limited as a finding may be at first, there is always a lot of effort involved. In this sense, we would like to thank all the people involved in the creation of this Research Topic, the authors and the reviewers, who have contributed to the scientific discourse necessary to sharpen the ideas and thoughts presented. Many thanks to the reviewers Francesca Giovanna Maria Gastaldi, Carolina Bringas Molleda, Anabela Conceição Pereira, Cristiana Lucretia Pop, and Lipaz Shamoa Nir.What insights can the reader expect from reading the papers collected in this Research Topic? The research has been conducted in heterogeneous cultural contexts: Russia, Brazil, Canada. The authors themselves point out that the results cannot be generalised, but must be understood in the cultural context itself. The authors work on their questions with extremely diverse methods. The methodologies include document analysis, regression analysis, hermeneutic approaches, and biographical interviews. It is worth pointing out that this diversity is an asset if it points to a common body of evidence; however, this Research Topic is too narrow for that, but we hope that it will stimulate further investigation in this area. certainly not yet sufficiently processed pandemic experience regarding the body image and, above all, the demographic and socioeconomic context, lifestyle, emotional stress, eating behaviour and infection with Covid 19. Being able to examine this interrelated multitude of factors leads to the collection of a very extensive data set with 2,220 participants. The academic context is interesting; pandemic, insofar as the focus was particularly on younger school children and older populations at particular risk. With the help of regression analyses, some further insights can be found that help us to better understand the influences on our body image. The interview study by Oxana Mikhaylova and Alexandra Bochaver deals with 50 girls suffering from anorexia, which could be read as the most special of the studies at the end. The study was conducted in Russia and is based on a psychoanalytical view of the development of eating disorders. The authors elaborate on the relationship between bullying and having anorexia and, in particular, examine the importance of a hostile family environment for the likelihood of becoming a victim of bullying when suffering from anorexia. The authors' thoughts and examples of the biographical interview material are interesting for all people who function as adult caregivers in schools, i.e., social workers, psychologists, and teachers because they show again how closely one has to look in order to realize the whole contextual information.We hope all readers will enjoy reading the published studies, above all, we hope that the understanding of the complex diversity of influence on our bodies as a central social symbol will be broadened and that we will become even more aware that how we think, feel and communicate about bodies is not trivial.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,048 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,022 | 0,025 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».