A STYLISH COMPARISON OF THE COMMENTS WRITED ON THE AL-UMDE OF EBU'L-BEREQAT EN-NESEFI (D. 710/1310)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
His full name is Abdullah b. Ahmed b. Mahmud, his soubriquet is Hâfızüddin, and his identity is Ebü'l-Berekât. He was given the title of 'an-Nasafi' in relation to the place where he was born. He was born in the city of Nesef, which is located near Bukhara, Uzbekistan and is known as "Karşı". Although the exact date of his birth is unknown, his teacher, with whom the tabakat books are allied, is Muhammed b. The mention of Abdüssettâr al-Kerderî's date of death as 642/1244 gives us Ebü'l-Berekât en-Nesefi's birth date as VII. It is predicted that it may be in the first quarter of the century. Nesefî, whose life we do not have much detailed information about, according to the information in his biography books, after receiving his scientific education, he worked as a professor in the Kutbiyye-Sultaniyye madrasahs in Kirman. Nesefi, who worked as a professor here for many years, came to Baghdad in 710 and on the way to returned back in the same year, and died in İzec and buried there. Although he is not only a famous scholar mostly in the fields of fiqh and fiqh methodology, but also he received the same attention in the field of kalam. As a matter of fact, the kalam text book named al-Umde, which he wrote was inspired by Ebü'l-Muîn en-Nesefî's al-Akaid, has been taught in madrasas for years and has been the bedside book of those who have just started the science of kalam. Since then, many scholars, especially the author himself, have conducted commentary, annotation and poetic research on this work. In this article, after providing information on al-Umde's commentary on Ebü'l-Berekât en-Nesefî, we review the analysis and comparison of this study in terms of style and sequence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle