MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4327844840 · doi:10.52058/2786-6300-2023-3(9)-142-182

ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROVISION SYSTEM

2023· article· uk· W4327844840 sur OpenAlexaff
Марина Грузд, Оксана Єрмоленко

Notice bibliographique

RevueАктуальні питання у сучасній науці · 2023
Typearticle
Langueuk
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueInformation Technology Governance and Strategy
Établissements canadiensInstitute on Governance
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBusinessCorporate governancePublic administrationProcess managementPolitical scienceFinance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of the study is to develop theoretical and methodological provisions and practical recommendations on the formation of directions for quality assurance of the system of public administrative services with the help of the development of electronic governance in the country.The directions for improving the quality of administrative services provision by means of electronic governance for citizens and business entities in accordance with European requirements have been determined, will increase the efficiency of the work of state authorities and local self-government bodies, reduce the risk of corruption during the provision of administrative services and improve investment attractiveness, business climate and competitiveness state The prerequisites for the legislative consolidation of the promotion of the digital order in Ukraine are considered, which testify to the confidence of the powerful public institutions regarding the strategy of implementing the general process of the country's development and the presence of a legislative and institutional basis for the implementation of a system of initiatives to build a system of administrative services that is more accessible to consumers.The qualitative and quantitative results of the improvement of the system of providing administrative services during the implementation of electronic Актуальні питання у сучасній науці № 3(9) 2023 143 governance innovations are considered, directions for the development of the processes of providing public services to the population by the government structures of Ukraine are proposed.The results of the analysis of the quality of the provision of public electronic services are provided, which testify to the effectiveness of electronic services, however, the quality of service bodies of public authorities and the provision of control over its quality by public administration subjects require consideration of the consolidation of the priorities of modern administrative reform and the implementation of the state development strategy, taking into account the course of the process transformation of Ukrainian society.An analysis of the basics of the existing practice of e-democracy in the country was carried out: the practice of applying the tools of e-democracy to scaling, stability, efficiency; political influence and the desire for changes in public policy, and recommendations are provided for subjects of public authority regarding the implementation of e-democracy initiatives to ensure effective interaction of the state, business and civil society institutions and popularization of the information society.Ways of modernizing the system of providing public services by means of electronic governance have been developed on the basis of the introduction of information and communication technologies, which in practical application by citizens of Ukraine creates opportunities to receive a wide range of services in a high-quality, efficient and transparent manner.The key opportunities and limitations regarding digitization in the country and the introduction of electronic governance of the system of providing administrative services are identified: reducing unjustified costs, taking into account in the activities of public authorities the needs of consumers in specific services and ensuring the proper quality of their provision, implementing a clear regulation of the activities of officials who perform the functions of the state, expansion of the list of administrative services and the transparency of their receipt, implementation of the principles of electronic democracy for the expansion of public rights and freedoms and changes in the relationship between public authorities and citizens.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,753
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueАктуальні питання у сучасній науціMême sujetInformation Technology Governance and StrategyTravaux en français237 207