Proppant Screen-Out During Re-Fracturing Caused by Damage of Heavy Mud in Existing Fractures: Case Study and Solutions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The reservoir pressure coefficient is over 1.80 in the Kelasu foreland area in western China. Heavy mud weighted by ultra-micro barite is used to kill wells for downhole operations. For the wells that have been fractured, the mud easily leaks into fractures, bringing the barite weighting agent into the existing fractures and damaging the well productivity. Re-fracturing is conducted in order to recover the well productivity, but abnormal pumping pressure and proppant screen-out are frequently encountered. Three typical wells that have encountered such problems were analyzed by construction data comparison and using the fracturing simulator StimPlan. The root causes were firstly theoretically analyzed and then laboratory tests were also carried out to validate our theoretical results. The comparison results show that the pressure for fracture extension during re-fracturing of the three wells is 20%-40% higher than the initial fracturing; the leakage of the heavy well killing fluid weighted by ultra-micro barite during downhole operations was the main cause of the abnormal pumping pressure and the proppant screen-out during re-fracturing. The laboratory test results showed that the properties of the ultra-micro barite well killing fluid is relatively good after rolling for 15 days under high temperature, but its density and rheological parameters tend to decline due to barite sedimentation; the invasion of the heavy well killing fluid into the matrix reduced Young's modulus by 3%-5% but increased Poisson's ratio by 102.42% maximally, which can consequently reduce a dynamic fracture width and lead to abnormally-high pumping pressure and proppant screen-out during re-fracturing. The damage of the heavy well killing fluid to the existing propped fractures was also serious. It reduced the propped fracture permeability by 50%-80% and the retained barite in the fractures was difficult to be displaced out. Several solutions have also been provided for wells with potential heavy mud damage. In high pressure wells where a high-density well killing fluid must be used during workover, acid-soluble solid is better to be used as a weighting agent. Besides, a re-fracturing pumping schedule should be designed with more and small proppant concentration stages if a well has been damaged by heavy mud in order to avoid screen-out. A barite removing agent was developed to remove the damage caused by the barite weighting agent, which can be used for barite removal before hydraulic fracturing to avoid abnormal pumping pressure and proppant screen-out. The use of this agent in well BZ-D significantly mitigates the pumping pressure during re-fracturing, and a production increase of 131% was obtained. This paper digs into the impact of heavy mud residue on fracture extension during re-fracturing through a well case study. A method of avoiding abnormal pumping pressure and proppant screen-out, using a barite dispersing and chelating agent before re-fracturing, was tried in a well and promising results were obtained. The understandings from this study provide a reference for a re-fracturing design of wells with potential heavy mud damage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».