Refugee Lifeworlds: The Afterlife of the Cold War in Cambodia by Y-Dang Troeung
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Refugee Lifeworlds: The Afterlife of the Cold War in Cambodia by Y-Dang Troeung Evyn Lê Espiritu Gandhi (bio) Refugee Lifeworlds: The Afterlife of the Cold War in Cambodia, by Y-Dang Troeung. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2022. Xxvii + 223 pp. $29.95 paperback. ISBN 978-1439921760. Chapter 1 of Refugee Lifeworlds: The Afterlife of the Cold War in Cambodia opens with a photograph that Y-Dang Troeung encountered in the archive: an image of a smiling Cambodian refugee mother and her young daughter, the latter identified as the "last" refugee of the Canadian government's Special Indochinese Refugee Program, displayed on the front page of the December 4, 1980 issue of the Montreal Gazette. Troeung writes that this is "an account of goodness–of good refugees entering the good refuge" (48). Yet the child in the photograph is not a silenced subject, a blank page upon which the Global North state can write its humanitarian narrative, erasing centuries of Indigenous genocide and racializing logics. For the child, it is revealed, is Troeung, who stubbornly writes back, revealing a much longer genealogy of the Cold War in Cambodia that preceded her family's entry into Canada. "Knit[ting] together" autotheory and literary analysis, Refugee Lifeworlds creates a "complex fabric" that reveals the "texture and temporalities of refugee life as embodied and inherited experience" (5). Because it opens chapter 1, this anecdote of archival encounter ostensibly presents a beginning of sorts. But it is a beginning that is delayed, put on hold, coming after a twenty-page preface that outlines the long durée of US intervention in Cambodia and a forty-five-page introduction that outlines the key terms and interventions of the book. In this way, Refugee Lifeworlds presents a formal alternative to "scholarly approaches that often treat the refugee as a figure who comes into being only through arrival in the asylum state," when "whiteness enters the frame as an adjudicator of the refugee's humanity" (ix). Moreover, this vignette does not follow the expected script of the liberal subject's self-possessing arrival to speech. Instead, Troeung reveals moments of stumbling and reversal, of difficulty and denial. As explained in the Introduction, when Troeung wrote to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) in 2021 [End Page 103] "asking them to take down" photos like these of herself and her family, explaining that she had given them "in a state of mental distress, and that the final article replicated a colonial practice of putting refugee images and information on public display in an exploitative way," the CBC denied the request, citing lack of evidence of a "mental health crisis at the time of the interview" (7–8). This autotheory example–one of many interwoven throughout the text–incisively illustrates the importance of putting critical refugee studies in conversation with critical disability studies: the book's main intervention. Refugee Lifeworlds takes the fact that "a quarter of Cambodia's population died during the genocide, and the remaining three-quarters of the population were physically and mentally debilitated" as a point of departure (12). Engaging critical refugee studies scholars such as Yến Lê Espiritu and Khatharya Um alongside critical disability scholars such as Jasbir Puar and Liat Ben-Moshe, Troeung argues for a shift from "the language of trauma as an individual, knowable impairment to that of disability, understood as both a lived embodiment and system of differential impairment of racialized and gendered bodies" (13). The book curates a "crip Cambodian refugee archive" that enacts a "politics of refusal . . . of imperial, carceral, and white supremacist state violence" (23–24). "Refugee lifeworlds," as an analytic, acknowledges the necropolitical logics of death and destruction that have structured Cambodian subjectivity, even as it asks us to consider what new epistemologies are possible in the wake of genocide. Ultimately, the book underscores the importance of an abolitionist project of "refugee and disability justice for all" (15). Refugee Lifeworlds consists of four body chapters followed by a short autotheory coda. Chapter 1 unpacks "Cambodia's Cold War episteme" which has rendered Cambodia a "minor anecdote" in the colonial imagination, setting up the importance of centering Cambodian narratives (50). The remaining chapters take up...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».