MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4327862816 · doi:10.1353/hpn.2023.0010

Teaching Central American Literature in a Global Context ed. by Gloria Elizabeth Chacón and Mónica Albizúrez Gil

2023· article· en· W4327862816 sur OpenAlex
Adrián Taylor Kane

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHispania · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)HistoryIndigenousColonialismArt historyAnthropologySociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Teaching Central American Literature in a Global Context ed. by Gloria Elizabeth Chacón and Mónica Albizúrez Gil Adrian Taylor Kane Chacón, Gloria Elizabeth, and Mónica Albizúrez Gil, editors. Teaching Central American Literature in a Global Context. MLA, 2022. Pp. 364. ISBN 978-1-60329-588-8. Gloria Elizabeth Chacón and Mónica Albizúrez Gil’s collection of essays Teaching Central American Literature in a Global Context contains twenty-eight essays by scholars teaching at universities in Central America, the United States, Canada, and Europe. The volume is well organized into seven sections. Part I: “Locating Central American Literature” situates Central American cultural production in a global context from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century by offering approaches to modernista and vanguardista cultural production and analyzing documentaries and crónicas as “imagetexts” that lend visibility to the history of Central America. Part II: “Visual Technologies and Understanding Central America” contains five essays that suggest specific films, shorts, photography, Google Maps, and travel as tools to provide deep context for Central American cultural production. Part III: “Mayan Literatures beyond the Local” emphasizes how indigenous literature engages with global issues such as colonialism, genocide, resistance, and migration by describing lessons on texts ranging from the Popol Wuj to the contemporary poetry of K’iche’ Mayan author Humberto Ak’abal. Part IV: “Black and Jewish Literatures from the Isthmus” contains lessons on works that treat the topic of Black experiences in Central America by authors such as Francisco Gavidia (El Salvador), Quince Duncan (Costa Rica), and Zee Edgell (Belize) as well as transnational Jewish Guatemalan authors Francisco Goldman, Eduardo Halfon, and Victor Perera. Part V: “Representations of Violence” examines cultural production centered on representations of and reflection on the theme of violence, with a primary focus on postwar literature such as that of Horacio Castellanos Moya’s Insensatez. Part VI: “Diasporas, Memory, and Deterritorialization” includes descriptions of units on gender, sexuality, violence, and migration; the migrant journey through Mexico; the issues of intergenerational trauma, historical memory, and impunity in Central American diaspora communities; and teaching students to interrogate deficient journalism on Central American migration. The final section, “Environmental and Social Justice,” suggests theoretical approaches, classroom activities, and primary and secondary readings for incorporating social justice units and the environmental humanities into courses on Central America. Central historical figures in this section include Archbishop Óscar Romero and environmental activist Berta Cáceres, both of whom were murdered for their commitment to social and environmental justice issues. The focus on literature in the volume’s title does not do justice to the breadth of approaches described in many of the essays. For example, M. Emilia Barbosa’s chapter focuses on the political performance art of Guatemalan Regina José Galindo, while Rita M. Palacios and Margarita Hernández de Polaczyk propose approaches that incorporate analysis of visual art. The chapter “Many Central Americas: Approaches to the Films Ixcanul and El regreso” offers anthropological and linguistic concepts useful for teaching feature-length films. Similarly, Guadalupe Escobar’s essay discusses analytical approaches to the documentary films Children of the Diaspora and Finding Óscar, and Aaron Lacayo describes a lesson that incorporates two contemporary short [End Page 141] films to teach Nicaragua’s political and cultural history. Julio Quintero’s essay “Peace and Reconciliation: Decoding Belonging in Guatemalan Photography” suggests incorporating photography as a tool to understand how society constructs and contests notions of citizenship. The inclusion of such chapters provides readers with a multitude of resources for creating a culturally rich classroom that goes beyond the exclusive study of literary texts. One of the volume’s strengths is its wide variety of theoretical approaches such as feminism, postcolonialism, cultural studies, gender and queer studies, critical race theory, and ecocriticism, among others. Its attention to indigenous forms of cultural production and other marginalized communities reflects the heterogeneity of the isthmus and moves well beyond canonical authors. The inclusion of the US Central American diaspora follows the recent expansion of Central American studies beyond the confines of the isthmus and further underscores the volume’s focus on the region’s global interconnectedness. Another practical component of many of the chapters...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,448
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,809

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle