Notice bibliographique
Résumé
mLife made its debut with the publication of the inaugurating issue on March 30, 2022. We are pleased to have published 42 high-quality articles, including reviews, research articles, and application notes, which cover microbial genetics, biochemistry and physiology, ecology and evolution, pathogenic and public health microbiology, and so forth. Nine of the articles concern technical innovations and applications in areas including genome editing, single-cell analysis, and database. To pay tribute to the great microbiologist Carl Woese on the 10th anniversary of his death, the Journal published a special section containing three thought-provoking articles in the last issue of the year. mLife and its collaborating publisher Wiley have made great efforts to increase the Journal's national and continental representation. As a result, the Journal received submissions from over 20 countries in five continents last year. The authors of the published articles are from China, United States, Great Britain, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, and Austria. We believe that quality is the life of a journal, and have strived to uphold the highest academic standard for mLife. Last year, we implemented strict and professional review and editing policies. Our editorial board members and invited reviewers have done a great job to ensure that only high-quality studies in a given field of microbiology were considered. As a result, only about 13% of the free submissions were accepted. Although it is apparently too early to provide a reliable assessment of the impacts of mLife as well as articles published so far in the journal, mLife fares relatively well among newly launched journals in microbiology and attracted a quite broad audience based on various metrics. Over 35,000 downloads from 39 countries were recorded for the last nine months of 2022 by Wiley Online Library alone. To serve the microbiology community and increase the visibility of mLife, we started a webinar series, referred to as the mLife Forum, which generally included three invited talks for a total of about two hours for each webinar. Five webinars on various topics of current interest were successfully held last year, often attracting a large audience (>3000 attendants/webinar). In collaboration with the Chinese Society for Microbiology (CSM), we have also incorporated a forum for early-career microbiologists into the regular program of the annual conference of CSM in 2022. The early career speakers were selected based on their excellent research published in mLife by associate editors and editors-in-chief. In its pursuit of excellence, mLife will strive to be innovative in scientific publication and further improve the editorial services to our authors by offering rapid and professional peer review, high-level copyediting and figure polishing, and timely and wide dissemination at no publication charge. The Journal will also make efforts to raise the number of articles published per year and increase the representation of countries in the publication. The new journal has received enthusiastic support from colleagues around the world, to whom we are deeply indebted. Also, we would like to express our appreciation to all editorial board members, authors, reviewers as well as Wiley for their enormous contributions to the publication of mLife. After the successful 1st year, we are confident that mLife will become a top-tier journal in the field of microbiology in the near future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,088 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,029 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,012 | 0,021 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,104 | 0,144 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».