MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4328053789 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2023.100168

Computed Tomography-Guided Computational Modeling to Guide Treatment in Aortic Stenosis With Extremely Large Aortic Annulus

2023· article· en· W4328053789 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueStructural Heart · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Heart Foundation of Australia
Mots-clésStenosisVentricleMedicineAortic valveRegurgitation (circulation)Bicuspid aortic valveCardiologyAscending aortaInternal medicineHeart valveAorta

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 78-year-old male with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis was assessed by the heart-team as inoperable given the presence of a porcelain ascending aorta. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a type-1 Sievers bicuspid aortic valve with a very large annular area at 1021 mm2, perimeter 115 mm, dimensions 37.1 × 36.0 mm and severe raphe and leaflet calcification. (Figure 1a and b). The inter-commissural distance at 4 mm above the annulus was 39.2 mm representing a flared anatomical configuration. Percutaneous implantation of a significantly overfilled balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) was considered; however, in the setting of an extremely large aortic annulus beyond the manufacturer recommendations, questions remained regarding procedural safety and feasibility. A combination of CT-guided computational modeling and bench testing was performed to predict valve anchoring, frame expansion, THV leaflet coaptation, and paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). A 29 mm SAPIEN-3 device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) was overfilled by 8 ml and expanded on the bench with high-definition video documenting kinetics of THV expansion and relaxation (Supplemental Video 1). THV frame expansion and height were recorded using digital calipers (Figure 2a and b). The overexpanded THV was placed in a sealed 3D-printed static flow loop with physiological mass pressure (50 mmHg) to simulate leaflet coaptation in diastole. Visual assessment demonstrated complete leaflet coaptation with no leak within the flow loop (Figure 2c). The cardiac CT was analyzed for predictive computational modeling of the SAPIEN-3 balloon-expandable THV. The aortic root and left ventricle were segmented and meshed in Materialize Mimics (Leuven, Belgium). The 29 mm SAPIEN-3 geometry was created from micro-CT measurements with additional data from bench testing (Figure 2). Finite element analysis was performed using Abaqus 2020 (Johnston, USA). Material properties were defined as hyperelastic for native soft tissues, elastic for calcium nodules, and elastic for the stent and balloon which were extracted from previous studies.1Bosmans B. Famaey N. Verhoelst E. Bosmans J. Vander Sloten J. A validated methodology for patient specific computational modeling of self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation.J Biomech. 2016; 49: 2824-2830Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 2Holzapfel G.A. Sommer G. Regitnig P. Anisotropic mechanical properties of tissue components in human atherosclerotic plaques.J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126: 657-665Crossref PubMed Scopus (320) Google Scholar, 3Tzamtzis S. Viquerat J. Yap J. Mullen M.J. Burriesci G. Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Med Eng Phys. 2013; 35: 125-130Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar The balloon was filled to +8 cc’s above nominal volume to simulate overexpansion of the THV followed by a balloon deflation step to account for tissue recoil (Figure 1c and Supplemental Video 2). CT simulation demonstrated an eccentrically expanded THV with average diameter of 30.4 mm and evidence of anchoring on the leaflet calcification (Figure 3a). PVR was evaluated following the stent deployment using computational fluid dynamics in Ansys Fluent (Canonsburg, USA). A nominal pressure in the aorta of 80 mmHg and 0 mmHg in the ventricle was applied to represent physiological diastolic conditions. The highest velocity PVR jets were predicted to originate anterolaterally (Figure 3b). The patient was successfully treated with a 29 mm SAPIEN-3 THV deployed with 8 ml of additional volume (Figure 1d). Post-dilatation was performed with the same overfilled balloon volume to optimize frame expansion. Intraprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated trivial valvular and mild PVR predominately located at the anterolateral aspect of the frame (Figure 3d and Supplemental Video 3). Post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) CT highlighted an eccentrically expanded frame with comparable dimensions to CT modeling (Figure 3c). To our knowledge, this is the largest aortic annulus successfully treated with a THV. It should be emphasized that this single report does not support the routine treatment of extremely large annuli with TAVR, which requires further clinical evaluation. Our case provides new insight into the potential role of CT-guided computational modeling to predict and optimize outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR for complex aortic valve disease. Future studies are needed to assess the ability of CT-guided computational modeling to guide TAVR procedural strategy across the spectrum of annuli size, THV devices, and procedural endpoints. Consent given by the patient for publication of this case. Dr Abdul Ihdayhid is supported by the National Heart Foundation and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Scholarships.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,125
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,778

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,361
Écart entre enseignants0,332 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle