MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W432838118

Introduction/Presentation Par Les Editeurs

2005· article· fr· W432838118 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michèle Vatz Laaroussi, Margaret Walton‐Roberts

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian ethnic studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationRefugeeEthnic groupCitizenshipRural areaPolitical scienceAttractionGeographyEconomic growthPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Citizenship and Immigration Canada is currently considering the opportunities and barriers for diversifying poles of attraction for newcomers to Canada, while some provinces (Saskatchewan, Alberta, New Brunswick) are reflecting on their immigrant reception and attraction policies, and Quebec, in particular, is analysing and evaluating the effects of its immigration regionalization policy. Researchers, public servants, decision makers, and community stakeholders brought together by Metropolis in 2003 agreed that, while interesting research existed on regionalization strategies at a macro-economic level, there was not enough data at local levels to support a comprehensive and sustained regionalization strategy. In research to date, researchers and decision makers have been interested in potential immigration areas--provinces that currently attract few immigrants and certain outlying areas or areas distant from the large cosmopolitan cities--and in the reception and retention capacities of rural areas. They want to know about the status of the populations who go to, or who could be directed to, these areas; the interest that these people may have in settling there; their specific needs; the adaptation processes they prompt; and the services required by refugees, students, seasonal immigrants, professionals, investors, young people, and families. These researchers and decision makers are looking at why immigrants chose these areas: the opportunity to become socio-economically established; the social, health, educational, and cultural services; and the presence of a critical mass of immigrants who have similar origins and paths and who are already settled there. Researchers are also studying cultural distances in terms of the ethnic backgrounds and the religions of these populations, and the capacity for social cohesion in communities based on the new ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity. A great deal of research focuses on economics, that is, immigrants' economic paths and potential socioeconomic openings in the possible areas. Under Canada's immigration policy, 200,000 people immigrate to Canada each year from Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Central and South America, and both western and eastern Europe. Two-thirds of these newcomers belong to a visible minority (Statistics Canada 2003), and more than 74 percent of them settle in Montreal, Vancouver, and Toronto--a level that has been sustained for over fifteen years (Metropolis 2003). While certain provinces are especially affected by immigration--Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec received more than 90 percent of immigrants to Canada over the last three years (Statistics Canada 2001)--others are just the opposite and are seeing their population shrink owing to the combined effects of an ageing population, a sharp fall in the birth rate, and a high out-migration rate. That is particularly true of the Maritime Provinces, where the low immigration rate (less than 1% of total immigration to Canada) far from makes up for the population decrease, especially when we consider that immigrants do not necessarily stay in their destination province. Over the last few years, New Brunswick has received 750 to 800 immigrants per year and now has a total population of nearly 720,000. This makes it one of the provinces with the fewest immigrants in Canada, a situation echoed in Saskatchewan (with 0.68% of immigration to Canada in 2001) and Manitoba (with a slightly higher rate of 1% over the last three years). These provinces are among the areas of the country with the lowest immigrant populations. Alberta has mid-level figures with 16,371 immigrants in 2001-6.54 percent of immigration to Canada, owing largely to the attraction of its two major cities: Calgary (with an average of 3.75% of Canadian immigration from 1999 to 2001) and Edmonton (with 1.9% during those same years). In these provinces that have little ethnic and religious diversity, the issue of language has even more influence on the immigrant integration process. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,623
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,102
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2005
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian ethnic studiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207