MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W433763910

Understanding the Economic Crisis: The Importance of Training in Critical Economics

2009· article· en· W433763910 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jim Stanford

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Australian political economy · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic Theory and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVisionPoliticsIdeologyNature versus nurtureSociologyPolitical sciencePolitical economyLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I am deeply honoured to deliver the second memorial lecture here at the University of Sydney in the name of Ted Wheelwright, one of the pioneers of the political economy movement. The courageous struggles to preserve a space here for critical and progressive thought were reaching their crux just as I began my undergraduate studies in economics at the University of Calgary--one of the most conservative universities in Canada--in 1979. The fact that Ted Wheelwright and his colleagues dared to establish an economics school with radical foundations, and that subsequent leaders and students would fight so hard to defend and nurture it, opened doors for me as I struggled to find alternative visions, and mentors to teach those visions, in my own economics education. The Political Economy program here became one of the most important and inspirational centres of radical economic thought in the English-speaking world. While tonight is the first opportunity I've had to visit your campus, your example, reflected in like-minded initiatives on other continents, enhanced my own intellectual and political options by expanding the terrain of debate within our stunted and ideological profession. Wheelwright's personal research agenda also had a direct relevance to the traditions of radical political economy in Canada. His focus on critically understanding the economic actions and effects of multinational corporations, and the dangers of the dependent mode of economic development characteristic of resource-abundant peripheral economies (like Australia and Canada), found immediate resonance in our own analyses of these problems. This included the thoroughly complementary work of scholars such as Mel Watkins (1963) and Kari Polanyi Levitt (1970), who wrote at about the same time as Ted of the economic and political dangers of a multinational-dominated, resource extractionoriented mode of development. Wheelwright's Australia: A Client State (with Greg Crough) could virtually have been re-issued in Canada, simply by changing the name of the country, so similar have been the circumstances of our respective trajectories of dependence. And so I would like to begin tonight by thanking all of you here in this program--professors, students and alumni--for your sustained effort, inspired by Wheelwright and the other giants who came together here to nurture and defend this space. Your efforts made a fundamental difference in my life and training. And they did likewise for many thousands of other progressive-minded economics students around the world, who know in their guts that there must be better ways to understand the economic world (and to change it), but need help finding the way. Your program remains one of the best initiatives for showing young progressive economists that way. A coherent, united and high-quality place to study radical economics is a precious, fragile asset. I am so impressed by the spirit of unity and celebration that clearly infuses this event tonight and I urge you all to continue investing the energy and care that this program needs and deserves. It is important not just for training the next generation of radical political economists, but for educating and strengthening our movements and struggles for social change. The importance of a critical economics pedagogy to those social change movements is the central topic for my presentation this evening. I consider myself an economics teacher, not just a practicing economist. I would guess that about a quarter of my work time is spent 'teaching,' in the broad sense of the term--although, unlike most in this room, I do not teach in a formal academic environment. Rather, my efforts to 'spread the word' take place among the working people who constitute the membership of my union (the Canadian Auto Workers), and the activist base of the various grass-roots movements and campaigns in which I am also engaged (as both an economist and an instructor). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,437
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,728

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,166
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,161 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Australian political economyMême sujetEconomic Theory and PolicyTravaux en français237 207