MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4360605670 · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000003346.03

PD41-03 12-MONTH OUTCOMES FROM A RANDOMIZED, SHAM CONTROLLED STUDY EVALUATING A NOVEL DRUG COATED BALLOON FOR THE TREATMENT OF BPH

2023· article· en· W4360605670 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven A. Kaplan, Jared Moss, Sheldon Freedman, Karl Coutinho, Ning Wu, Mitchell Efros, Dean Elterman, Richard D’Anna, Osvaldo Padron, Kaiser J. Robertson, Samuel Lawindy, Sandeep Mistry, Neal D. Shore, Jeffrey Spier, Jed Kaminestky, Brian C. Mazzarella, David Cahn, Mark Jalkut, Alexis E. Te

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Urology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePsychoanalysisArt historyClassicsHistoryPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD41-03 12-MONTH OUTCOMES FROM A RANDOMIZED, SHAM CONTROLLED STUDY EVALUATING A NOVEL DRUG COATED BALLOON FOR THE TREATMENT OF BPH Steven A. Kaplan, Jared Moss, Sheldon Freedman, Karl Coutinho, Ning Wu, Mitchell Efros, Dean Elterman, Richard D'Anna, Osvaldo Padron, Kaiser J. Robertson, Samuel Lawindy, Sandeep Mistry, Neal Shore, Jeffrey Spier, Jed Kaminestky, Brian Mazzarella, David Cahn, Mark Jalkut, and Alexis Te Steven A. KaplanSteven A. Kaplan More articles by this author , Jared MossJared Moss More articles by this author , Sheldon FreedmanSheldon Freedman More articles by this author , Karl CoutinhoKarl Coutinho More articles by this author , Ning WuNing Wu More articles by this author , Mitchell EfrosMitchell Efros More articles by this author , Dean EltermanDean Elterman More articles by this author , Richard D'AnnaRichard D'Anna More articles by this author , Osvaldo PadronOsvaldo Padron More articles by this author , Kaiser J. RobertsonKaiser J. Robertson More articles by this author , Samuel LawindySamuel Lawindy More articles by this author , Sandeep MistrySandeep Mistry More articles by this author , Neal ShoreNeal Shore More articles by this author , Jeffrey SpierJeffrey Spier More articles by this author , Jed KaminestkyJed Kaminestky More articles by this author , Brian MazzarellaBrian Mazzarella More articles by this author , David CahnDavid Cahn More articles by this author , Mark JalkutMark Jalkut More articles by this author , and Alexis TeAlexis Te More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003346.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study evaluating the Optilume BPH System. Optilume BPH is a novel minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) that combines mechanical dilation with the delivery of paclitaxel for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH. Mechanical dilation with Optilume BPH achieves an anterior commissurotomy, while delivery of paclitaxel is intended to maintain luminal patency during healing. METHODS: 148 subjects were randomized in a 2:1 fashion at 18 centers in the US and Canada. Subjects and evaluating personnel were blinded to treatment through 12-months. 12-month follow-up is complete. Symptom improvement was measured utilizing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and BPH Impact Index (BPH-II), functional improvement measured by peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR). Erectile and ejaculatory function were evaluated utilizing validated questionnaires. Adverse events were prospectively collected and relatedness to treatment was adjudicated by an independent, blinded clinical events committee. RESULTS: Subjects treated with Optilume BPH showed a significant reduction in IPSS through 12 months (23.4 vs 10.9, p<0.001). Improvement in IPSS at 12 months was significantly greater for Optilume BPH compared to Sham in the intent-to-treat population (11.5 vs 4.8, p<0.001). Qmax more than doubled from 8.9 mL/sec at baseline to 19.0 mL/sec after treatment with Optilume BPH, while average PVR decreased from 84 mL to 58 mL (p=0.004). There were no changes in perceived sexual or ejaculatory function. The most reported treatment related adverse events after treatment with Optilume BPH included hematuria (39/98 [39.8%]), urinary tract infection (11/98 [11.2%]), and dysuria (8/98 [8.2%]). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Optilume BPH resulted in significant, immediate symptomatic and functional improvements and to date the highest Qmax reported in BPH MIST trials. Durability of these outcomes was shown through 12 months follow-up, demonstrating the intended effect of an immediate mechanical benefit that is sustained long-term by the delivery of paclitaxel. Long-term outcomes will be verified with 5 year follow-up for Optilume BPH. Source of Funding: Urotronic, Inc © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1059 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Steven A. Kaplan More articles by this author Jared Moss More articles by this author Sheldon Freedman More articles by this author Karl Coutinho More articles by this author Ning Wu More articles by this author Mitchell Efros More articles by this author Dean Elterman More articles by this author Richard D'Anna More articles by this author Osvaldo Padron More articles by this author Kaiser J. Robertson More articles by this author Samuel Lawindy More articles by this author Sandeep Mistry More articles by this author Neal Shore More articles by this author Jeffrey Spier More articles by this author Jed Kaminestky More articles by this author Brian Mazzarella More articles by this author David Cahn More articles by this author Mark Jalkut More articles by this author Alexis Te More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,351
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of UrologyMême sujetOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentTravaux en français237 207