Stressed and overworked: What the Commonwealth Fund’s 2022 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians in 10 Countries means for the UK
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Key points •At the time of the survey, GPs in the UK reported providing a higher proportion of remote appointments than any other country.In England, GPs reported providing around 60% of appointments remotely -higher than estimates from other available data.Understanding exact rates of remote consultations is challenging -and differences between countries may be down to GP and patient preferences, policy context, COVID-19 rates and more.• GPs in the UK report assessing patients' social and economic needs, including social isolation, housing issues and domestic violence.But they also identify major barriers to coordinating support for patients -including lack of follow-up from community services and staff gaps.UK GPs rate these as greater challenges than GPs in most countries.• Decisive policy action is needed to improve the working lives of GPs in the UKincluding to boost GP capacity and reduce workload.Policymakers considering options for primary care reform should recognise the strengths of general practice in the UK and work with the profession rather than against it -not least because retaining GPs and other primary care staff is essential for the long-term sustainability of services. About this reportHow do the experiences of GPs compare between countries?And how have they changed over time?We worked with the Commonwealth Fund to survey primary care physicians in 10 high-income countries, including the UK, during 2022.The survey has been running for several years 34,35 and asks GPs about their working lives and wellbeing, quality of care and how it is delivered.The 2022 survey is the first since the COVID-19 pandemic, so we also added questions about its impact on GPs.Taken together, the data help tell us how general practice is changing internationally -for better and for worse.* Countries in the survey use different terminology to refer to physicians working in primary care and some have multiple specialties working in primary care.We use general practitioner or GP as a shorthand to refer to all primary care physicians within the survey when presenting the results.† Norway was included in the 2012, 2015 and 2019 versions of the survey, but is not included in this survey.* Margins of error for the countries of the UK are: England -4.4%, Scotland -9.8%, Wales -9.5%, Northern Ireland -11.5%.Further information, including margins of error for international comparisons, can be found in the full methodology report.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».