The Queen’s University Administrative Internship (QUAI): A First-in-Canada Experiential Learning Opportunity for Ph.D. Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The scarcity of tenure-track positions for Ph.D. students has resulted in many turning their interest and attention to alternative career opportunities within academia. It is here that universities can play a role by providing resources and developing career opportunities that would benefit from such highly skilled graduates. Such career prospects can range from project grant management to research institute administration. However, the visibility of these career pathways is either not fully apparent or not always encouraged. Additionally, even for individuals who have secured tenure-stream positions, there is often little knowledge about how university administration functions. This situation can leave faculty, staff, and students without the necessary awareness or understanding of university environments that support education and research success. Queen’s University is well-positioned to provide professional development and experiential learning opportunities to Ph.D. students. In doing so, Queen’s University could address both the need for – and growing interest in – diversified employment opportunities. We propose Queen’s University augment existing professional development opportunities by implementing the Queen’s University Administrative Internship (QUAI). This internship program would match Ph.D. students with administrative units and/or research institutes to both highlight alternative careers pathways in academia and broaden the scope for employment options post-graduation.To our knowledge, this program with semester-long placements would not only be the first at Queen’s University but also the first in Canada. The goal of QUAI is for interns to gain an in-depth knowledge of university administration while learning new skills and strengthening networks. Interns will enhance their professional profile as they prepare for academic, research, or administration positions. The program would also supplement their professional skills portfolio by giving them institutional understanding when applying for careers beyond traditional academia. It would allow interns to learn about the university administrator profession. Our strategy will leverage Queen’s University administrative units across campus as experiential training grounds for the next generation of research administrators to achieve these goals.We propose to structure the QUAI into the following components: 1) work shadowing with senior leaders, 2) mentoring with senior leaders in host units or other units. and 3) professional skills development by working on projects, attending workshops, and networking with peers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».