MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4360977957 · doi:10.1353/see.2022.0082

The Routledge World Companion to Polish Literature ed. by Tomasz Bilczewski; Stanley Bill, and Magdalena Popiel

2022· article· en· W4360977957 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kasia Szymańska

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Slavonic and East European Review · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryClassicsArt historyMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Routledge World Companion to Polish Literature ed. by Tomasz Bilczewski; Stanley Bill, and Magdalena Popiel Kasia Szymańska Bilczewski, Tomasz; Bill, Stanley and Popiel, Magdalena (eds). The Routledge World Companion to Polish Literature. Routledge, Abingdon and New York, 2022. xix + 450 pp. Illustrations. Notes. References. Index. £160.00; £35.99 (e-book). This is an unprecedentedly busy time for Polish studies abroad. In the past few years, at least three different English-language textbooks and companions to Polish literature and culture have offered new perspectives on its history and reception. To start with, the monumental textbook, Being Poland: A New History of Polish Literature and Culture since 1918 (eds T. Trojanowska, J. Niżyńska, P. Czapliński, Toronto, 2018), marked the centenary of Poland's regained independence and brought into discussion a wide range of new genres, topics and approaches (graphic novels, film, mass media, multilingualism, translation). In turn, Polish Literature as World Literature (eds P. Florczyk and K. A. Wiśniewski, London, 2023), looks at a relatively modest selection of sixteen essays concentrating only on explicit contributions of Polish authors to world literature. Somewhat bookended by these two volumes, The Routledge World Companion to Polish Literature strikes the middle ground between the formats of the other two publications. On the one hand, this heavy tome replicates the panache and broad sweep of a comprehensive textbook of Polish literature. The editors have assembled a series of thirty-three case studies, all neatly divided into traditional literary epochs across an impressively long time-span from the Middle Ages to the present day, and incorporating many different literary genres (e.g. poetry, the novel, the short story, memoir, travel writing). On the other hand, the book offers a focused selection of case studies and close readings guided by the interests of world literature. By tracing the meandering history of how some authors and their works were transplanted into different languages and read by international audiences, the book aims to tell a different history of Polish literature: that written by its readers, translators and aficionados abroad. The key strength of the volume lies in its kaleidoscopic overview of micro-stories, as the volume treats its readers to a wide array of international encounters. Some of its more successful approaches stem from the following strategy: where a Polish author has engaged with intercultural material (e.g. Ryszard Kapuściński travelling to China, or Mariusz Wilk writing Polish-Russian prose), let us see the other side of the coin by examining how the work has been received in that other cultural realm. It is thus rewarding to read about the Italian fascination with Henryk Sienkiewicz's vision of Nero's Rome in his novel, Quo vadis (1895–96); to discover the Lithuanian counterpart of poet Adam Mickiewicz who completes his otherwise Polonized picture in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth; and to see how Dutch poets engaged with [End Page 747] Zbigniew Herbert's Mr Cogito (1974) in response to his essays on seventeenth-century Dutch art. While other combinations were more serendipitous, some of them proved equally fruitful, especially when foregrounding the role of translation and rewriting in the transfer. Who would have thought that Mickiewicz's poems could be reimagined and read against the historical backdrop of slavery in Brazil; that the so-called '9/11 poem' by Adam Zagajewski has travelled far and wide, resonating with so many distinct audiences; that dialogues between Jewish and Polish characters in Bolesław Prus's The Doll (1890) were translated into Japanese by means of katakana and hiragana scripts to render the novel's linguistic variation; and that one missing phrase across different translations and editions of Miron Białoszewski's Memoir of the Warsaw Uprising (1970) could bear such significance for its interpretation alongside other war testimonies? These literary excursions not only give us insight into how Polish works are circulated and read beyond their original context of publication, but they also reveal which of their themes and qualities lend themselves to sometimes surprising and unconventional readings. While I am largely enthusiastic about the ideas underpinning the volume, I would like to raise a few caveats related to its presentation...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,226
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Slavonic and East European ReviewMême sujetPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesTravaux en français237 207