Collagen supplementation for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We read with great interest the article by Jabbari et al. on the role of collagen supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA).1 We appreciate the authors' valuable contribution to this comprehensive systematic review; however, we would like to highlight some key points. First, although the authors extracted information on different types of collagen such as intact, hydrolyzed, type I and type II collagen was extracted, there was a lack of details on residual confounders such as concurrent vitamin C (Vit C) supplementation. Vit C plays a crucial role in the absorption and production of collagen in the human body and its deficiency can affect the formation of a mature collagen network.2, 3 Specifically, maintaining a normal mature collagen network in humans depends on the anti-scurvy properties of Vit C, which prevent the auto-inactivation of the two key enzymes in collagen biosynthesis, lysyl and prolyl hydroxylase.2 Age and collagen-related food intake or nutritional support,4 which can influence the rate and amount of collagen production, are also significant residual confounders that should be considered.5 Likewise, effect measure modification by common comorbidities or risk factors for RA and OA of inflammatory or autoimmune conditions,6, 7 including psoriasis,8, 9 psoriatic arthritis,10, 11 spondyloarthritis,12 irritable bowel syndrome,13 periodontitis or other oral diseases,7, 14-21 fibromyalgia,22 and obstructive sleep apnea,23, 24 may be elucidated to identify populations that may benefit from collagen supplementation.To better understand the safety and adverse effects of collagen supplementation, it is important to consider potential confounders, such as the concomitant use of medications. This would be essential in determining whether the observed toxicities were a result of collagen supplementation or co-medications. To aid in interpreting safety profiles, algorithms for causality assessment of adverse events, similar to those used in research on drug toxicity and adverse drug reactions,25-27 can be applied. Therefore, further subgroup analysis or adjustment of these confounders may be necessary to address this issue. Second, while the included studies used the American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index for the assessment of RA and OA, respectively, there are other clinically significant protocols or indexes that can be applied in different circumstances. For instance, the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is a useful tool for assessing disease activity in patients with RA, as it evaluates 28 tender and swollen joints, general health, and levels of acute phase reactants such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.28-33 Similarly, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a suitable measurement tool for assessing OA in young and old adults, with adequate internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity.34-37 Furthermore, the Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form are reliable and valid instruments that should be considered, especially for patients with OA related to ligament or meniscus injury.38, 39 In conclusion, to improve patient care and patient education,22, 40, 41 future studies should address important residual confounders and implement clinically significant protocols to provide more evidence for managing RA and OA. This research was not sponsored by a specific project grant. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors provided their ideas and critical contribution. YC and CH contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. YC and CH contributed equally as first authors. KC and KSM contributed equally as corresponding authors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,032 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».