Diffusion tensor imaging of fetal spinal cord: feasibility and gestational‐age‐related changes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Objectives Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the fetal brain is a relatively new technique that allows evaluation of white matter tracts of the central nervous system throughout pregnancy, as well as in certain pathological conditions. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of DTI of the spinal cord in utero and to examine gestational‐age (GA)‐related changes in DTI parameters during pregnancy. Methods This was a prospective study conducted between December 2021 and June 2022 in the LUMIERE Platform, Necker–Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France, as part of the LUMIERE SUR LE FETUS trial. Women with a pregnancy between 18 and 36 weeks of gestation without fetal or maternal abnormality were eligible for inclusion. Sagittal diffusion‐weighted scans of the fetal spine were acquired, without sedation, using a 1.5‐Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. The imaging parameters were as follows: 15 non‐collinear direction diffusion‐weighted magnetic‐pulsed gradients with a b‐value 700 s/mm2 and one B0 image without diffusion‐weighting; slice thickness, 3 mm; field of view (FOV), 36 mm; phase FOV, 1.00; voxel size, 4.5 × 2.8 × 3 mm3; number of slices, 7–10; repetition time, 2800 ms; echo time, minimum; and total acquisition time, 2.3 min. DTI parameters, including fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), were extracted at the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar levels of the spinal cord. Cases with motion degradation and those with aberrant reconstruction of the spinal cord on tractography were excluded. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate GA‐related changes of DTI parameters during pregnancy. Results During the study period, 42 pregnant women were included at a median GA of 29.3 (range, 22.0–35.7) weeks. Five (11.9%) patients were not included in the analysis because of fetal movement. Two (4.8%) patients with aberrant tractography reconstruction were also excluded from analysis. Acquisition of DTI parameters was feasible in all remaining cases (35/35). Increasing GA correlated with increasing FA averaged over the entire fetal spinal cord (r, 0.37; P < 0.01), as well as at the individual cervical (r, 0.519; P < 0.01), upper thoracic (r, 0.468; P < 0.01), lower thoracic (r, 0.425; P = 0.02) and lumbar (r, 0.427; P = 0.02) levels. There was no correlation between GA and ADC averaged over the entire spinal cord (r, 0.01; P = 0.99) or at the individual cervical (r, −0.109; P = 0.56), upper thoracic (r, −0.226; P = 0.22), lower thoracic (r, −0.052; P = 0.78) or lumbar (r, −0.11; P = 0.95) levels. Conclusions This study shows that DTI of the spinal cord is feasible in normal fetuses in typical clinical practice and allows extraction of DTI parameters of the spinal cord. There is a significant GA‐related change in FA in the fetal spinal cord during pregnancy, which may result from decreasing water content as observed during myelination of fiber tracts occurring in utero. This study may serve as a basis for further investigation of DTI in the fetus, including research into its potential in pathological conditions that impact spinal cord development. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».